{"doi":"10.7490/f1000research.1116256.1","title":"Stakeholder checklist for priority-setting in low and middle-income countries","abstract":"<ns3:p>This stakeholder checklist is a tool to support the identification of the types of stakeholders who are likely to have a role in priority-setting policy work in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). The checklist was developed to guide the initial technical support provided by IDSI in its engagement with a new country, but we believe it can also be a useful tool for any organisations or individuals engaging in similar work. The stakeholders who may be involved in the process of decision making (including follow-up and review) will often be specific to the type of allocation problem under consideration. We have aimed to make this tool general, so it is a tool for a broad range of problems. Not every stakeholder need necessarily have a role in every situation. This tool lists the categories identified in IDSI’s capacity building framework and indicates questions we deemed helpful for identifying stakeholders and their institutional affiliations. The checklist is most likely to be useful in settings where there is limited experience of, or resources for, stakeholder consultation and participation. Further, once the stakeholders are identified and a specific policy proposal is defined, it can serve as a first sage in an analysis of potential stakeholder roles.</ns3:p>","journal":null,"year":null,"id":611405,"datarank":0.16479184330021646,"base_score":1.0986122886681096,"endowment":1.0986122886681096,"self_citation_contribution":0.16479184330021646,"citation_network_contribution":0.0,"self_endowment_contribution":0.16479184330021646,"citer_contribution":0.0,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":2,"citer_count":0,"citers_with_citation_signal":0,"citers_with_endowment":0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":1573502,"name":"Ioana Vlad","orcid":null,"position":0,"is_corresponding":false}],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"resolved":true,"title":"Stakeholder checklist for priority-setting in low and middle-income countries","abstract":"<ns3:p>This stakeholder checklist is a tool to support the identification of the types of stakeholders who are likely to have a role in priority-setting policy work in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). The checklist was developed to guide the initial technical support provided by IDSI in its engagement with a new country, but we believe it can also be a useful tool for any organisations or individuals engaging in similar work. The stakeholders who may be involved in the process of decision making (including follow-up and review) will often be specific to the type of allocation problem under consideration. We have aimed to make this tool general, so it is a tool for a broad range of problems. Not every stakeholder need necessarily have a role in every situation. This tool lists the categories identified in IDSI’s capacity building framework and indicates questions we deemed helpful for identifying stakeholders and their institutional affiliations. The checklist is most likely to be useful in settings where there is limited experience of, or resources for, stakeholder consultation and participation. Further, once the stakeholders are identified and a specific policy proposal is defined, it can serve as a first sage in an analysis of potential stakeholder roles.</ns3:p>","is_dataset_classified":null,"base_score":1.0986122886681096,"endowment":1.0986122886681096,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"21097893","pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W2904192181","authors":[],"funders":[],"total_grants":0,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"citation_trend":[{"year":2020,"count":1},{"year":2022,"count":1}],"oa_status":"green","license":"cc-by","oa_locations":[{"url":"https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1116256.1","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"https://f1000research.com/documents/7-1718","host_type":"journal"}],"fields_of_study":["Public-Private Partnership Projects","Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy"],"mesh_terms":[],"keywords":["Checklist","Stakeholder","Stakeholder engagement","Work (physics)","Process (computing)","Identification (biology)","Stakeholder analysis","Business","Public relations","Process management","Knowledge management","Environmental resource management","Political science","Psychology","Computer science","Engineering","Economics"],"sdg_mappings":[{"sdg_number":0,"sdg_label":"Peace, Justice and strong institutions"}],"linked_datasets":[],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-08-01T19:18:26.220942Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}