{"doi":"10.4061/2011/231926","title":"Definition of Nonresponse to Analgesic Treatment of Arthritic Pain: An Analytical Literature Review of the Smallest Detectable Difference, the Minimal Detectable Change, and the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Pain Visual Analog Scale","abstract":"<jats:p>Our objective was to develop a working definition of nonresponse to analgesic treatment of arthritis, focusing on the measurement of pain on the 0–100 mm pain visual analog scale (VAS). We reviewed the literature to assess the smallest detectable difference (SDD), the minimal detectable change (MDC), and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The SDD for improvement reported in three studies of rheumatoid arthritis was 18.6, 19.0, and 20.0. The median MDC was 25.4 for 7 studies of osteoarthritis and 5 studies of rheumatoid arthritis (calculated for a reliability coefficient of 0.85). The MCID increased with increasing baseline pain score. For baseline VAS tertiles defined by scores of 30–49, 50–65, and &gt;65, the MCID for improvement was, respectively, 7–11 units, 19–27 units, and 29–37 units. Nonresponse can thus be defined in terms of the MDC for low baseline pain scores and in terms of the MCID for high baseline scores.</jats:p>","journal":"International Journal of Inflammation","year":2011,"id":630526,"datarank":0.7130385286659547,"base_score":4.7535901911063645,"endowment":4.7535901911063645,"self_citation_contribution":0.7130385286659547,"citation_network_contribution":0.0,"self_endowment_contribution":0.7130385286659547,"citer_contribution":0.0,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":115,"citer_count":0,"citers_with_citation_signal":0,"citers_with_endowment":0,"datacite_reuse_total":2,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":1633497,"name":"Stephanie D. Taylor","orcid":null,"position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1633498,"name":"Douglas J. Watson","orcid":null,"position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":659726,"name":"Paul M. Peloso","orcid":"0000-0001-6979-306X","position":3,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":82855,"name":"Alan Morrison","orcid":"0000-0002-2412-7669","position":4,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1614511,"name":"Melissa E. Stauffer","orcid":null,"position":0,"is_corresponding":false}],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"resolved":true,"title":"Definition of Nonresponse to Analgesic Treatment of Arthritic Pain: An Analytical Literature Review of the Smallest Detectable Difference, the Minimal Detectable Change, and the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Pain Visual Analog Scale","abstract":"<jats:p>Our objective was to develop a working definition of nonresponse to analgesic treatment of arthritis, focusing on the measurement of pain on the 0–100 mm pain visual analog scale (VAS). We reviewed the literature to assess the smallest detectable difference (SDD), the minimal detectable change (MDC), and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The SDD for improvement reported in three studies of rheumatoid arthritis was 18.6, 19.0, and 20.0. The median MDC was 25.4 for 7 studies of osteoarthritis and 5 studies of rheumatoid arthritis (calculated for a reliability coefficient of 0.85). The MCID increased with increasing baseline pain score. For baseline VAS tertiles defined by scores of 30–49, 50–65, and &gt;65, the MCID for improvement was, respectively, 7–11 units, 19–27 units, and 29–37 units. Nonresponse can thus be defined in terms of the MDC for low baseline pain scores and in terms of the MCID for high baseline scores.</jats:p>","is_dataset_classified":null,"base_score":4.7535901911063645,"endowment":4.7535901911063645,"datacite_reuse_total":2,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"21755025","pmcid":"PMC3132608","openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W2063203898","authors":[],"funders":[{"funder_name":"Merck","grant_id":"","title":null}],"total_grants":1,"fwci":4.6316,"citation_percentile":0.94885933,"influential_citations":0,"citation_trend":[{"year":2012,"count":6},{"year":2013,"count":10},{"year":2014,"count":7},{"year":2015,"count":11},{"year":2016,"count":13},{"year":2017,"count":7},{"year":2018,"count":12},{"year":2019,"count":12},{"year":2020,"count":6},{"year":2021,"count":9},{"year":2022,"count":8},{"year":2023,"count":8},{"year":2024,"count":4},{"year":2025,"count":2}],"oa_status":"gold","license":"cc-by","oa_locations":[{"url":"https://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/iji/2011/231926.pdf","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"https://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/iji/2011/231926.pdf","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/iji/2011/231926.pdf","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/iji/2011/231926.xml","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/231926","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21755025","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"https://doaj.org/article/1b85d4c0ee3142b48503a1442c74dcc9","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3132608","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3132608","host_type":"Europe_PMC"},{"url":"https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3132608?pdf=render","host_type":"Europe_PMC"}],"fields_of_study":["Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies","Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects","Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms"],"mesh_terms":[],"keywords":["Minimal clinically important difference","Medicine","Visual analogue scale","Osteoarthritis","Rheumatoid arthritis","Analgesic","Arthritis","Physical therapy","Randomized controlled trial","Anesthesia","Internal medicine","Alternative medicine","Pathology"],"sdg_mappings":[],"linked_datasets":[{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.22621108.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Laser therapy versus pulsed electromagnetic field therapy as treatment modalities for early knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.22621108","title":"Additional file 1 of Laser therapy versus pulsed electromagnetic field therapy as treatment modalities for early knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"}],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-08-05T21:33:00.866726Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}