{"doi":"10.3389/fsufs.2024.1450833","title":"Editorial: Traditional knowledge in food activism and governance","abstract":"Still, in the recent past, TK was marginalized in public discourse under the weight of a universalistic imposition of the modern Western scientific model of science and academic knowledge [2]. More recently, however, awareness of the value of TK has grown significantly. Several initiatives have emerged through which institutions and enterprises have begun incorporating TK into their policies and projects [3]. This outlines an emerging process of knowledge pluralization, which promises greater participation in developing a collective vision for the future [4].TK has found practical applications in food and food systems. Numerous initiatives have been launched to preserve and develop traditional foods and their underlying knowledge. These initiatives have demonstrated TK's value in conserving biodiversity and cultural diversity and paved the way for sustainable development. This practical aspect of TK in food and food systems makes it a compelling topic for study. Scientific discourse has extensively examined TK and TEK in terms of perceptions, utilization, and management of various environmental and biological food resources, local food processing methods, and their associated socio-cultural significance [5]. However, there needs to be a better focus on how TK and TEK connect groups of individuals, communities, social movements, and economic and political institutions, as well as networks of practices involving entrepreneurship, production, consumption, and governance. Understanding these connections is essential for fostering concrete applications of TK and TEK and, ultimately, for achieving food sustainability and sovereignty. This Research Topic seeks to address this gap by bringing together insights from the global community to illuminate the diverse ways in which TK and TEK related to food can serve as a vital tool for entrepreneurship, management, and development planning. Specifically, the contributions to this Research Topic revolve around three main overlapping themes: (1) food sovereignty, (2) Indigenous governance, and (3) sustainable development.Food sovereignty is the right of communities to define their food systems, ensuring access to healthy, culturally appropriate, and sustainably produced foods [6]. In their paper on \"Embroidering Care and Reciprocity\", Thelma Mendes Pontes and colleagues examine the contributions of rural farmer feminism and agroecology to food sovereignty among female coffee growers in Veracruz, Mexico. The authors use embroidery as a metaphor to illustrate how TK and practices related to health, food gathering, and bartering extend from families to territories, thereby promoting general Earth stewardship.From a different perspective, Andrea Hanke and her team illuminate the link between food sovereignty and TK in their article \"Supporting Inuit Food Sovereignty through Collaborative Research of an At-Risk Caribou Herd\". The authors investigate the issues concerning caribou herding in the Canadian Arctic, a critical component of Inuit food systems, utilising the lens of Inuit TK. They provide a novel account of six dimensions of environmental health relating to caribou in support of Inuit food sovereignty, laying the basis for a collaborative approach to caribou conservation.These two articles also revolve around the concept of Indigenous governance, which consists of strategies and practices of Indigenous management that emphasise self-determination, TK, and sustainable resource management. Kimberly L. Paul and colleagues also investigate the intersection between Indigenous governance and TK. In their article \"Blackfeet Innovation Pathways to Food Sovereignty\", they focus on the Blackfeet Nation's Agriculture Resource Management Plan in northwestern Montana, USA, highlighting how Indigenous-led sustainable agriculture can provide a way forward to prioritise economic development, health, and ecological sensitivity, and achieve food sovereignty through community-based planning and strategic p","journal":"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","year":2024,"id":486223,"datarank":0.0,"base_score":0.0,"endowment":0.0,"self_citation_contribution":0.0,"citation_network_contribution":0.0,"self_endowment_contribution":0.0,"citer_contribution":0.0,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":4,"citer_count":0,"citers_with_citation_signal":0,"citers_with_endowment":0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":0.9537,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":true,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":"2024-01-01","fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":1274103,"name":"Ina Vandebroek","orcid":"0000-0002-1663-0045","position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1329645,"name":"Andréa Pieroni","orcid":"0000-0002-2302-6380","position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1329644,"name":"Michele Filippo Fontefrancesco","orcid":"0000-0003-3247-6110","position":0,"is_corresponding":true}],"reference_count":6,"raw_metadata":null,"created_at":"2026-07-19T02:07:57.049469Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}