{"doi":"10.23977/phpm.2022.020312","title":"Research on Medical Record Quality Management Based on FOCUS-PDCA Program","abstract":null,"journal":"MEDS Public Health and Preventive Medicine","year":2022,"id":637649,"datarank":0.0,"base_score":0.0,"endowment":0.0,"self_citation_contribution":0.0,"citation_network_contribution":0.0,"self_endowment_contribution":0.0,"citer_contribution":0.0,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":0,"citer_count":0,"citers_with_citation_signal":0,"citers_with_endowment":0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"resolved":true,"title":"Research on Medical Record Quality Management Based on FOCUS-PDCA Program","abstract":"Objective: To explore the application value of FOCUS-PDCA program in quality control of medical records. Methods: 200 medical records of gynecological inpatients in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The observation group was treated with FOCUS-PDCA procedure, while the control group was treated with traditional medical record quality control method, and the quality defects of the two groups were compared. Results: The defect rate of terminal medical records in the observation group (including homepage information missing or error, progress note defect, admission records defect, operation records defect, informed consent defect, and discharge note defect) was significantly lower than that of control group, P < 0.05. Conclusion: FOCUS-PDCA program can significantly improve the medical record quality, which is worthy of promotion in clinic.","is_dataset_classified":null,"base_score":0.0,"endowment":0.0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"19910364","pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W4297145483","authors":[],"funders":[],"total_grants":0,"fwci":0.0,"citation_percentile":0.14466027,"influential_citations":0,"citation_trend":[],"oa_status":"hybrid","license":"cc-by","oa_locations":[{"url":"http://www.clausiuspress.com/assets/default/article/2022/09/23/article_1663939810.pdf","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"http://www.clausiuspress.com/assets/default/article/2022/09/23/article_1663939810.pdf","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://www.clausiuspress.com/assets/default/article/2022/09/23/article_1663939810.pdf","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://doi.org/10.23977/phpm.2022.020312","host_type":"journal"}],"fields_of_study":["Medical Research and Treatments"],"mesh_terms":[],"keywords":["PDCA","Medical record","Promotion (chess)","Medicine","Quality (philosophy)","Control (management)","Quality management","Focus group","Focus (optics)","Family medicine","Operations management","Surgery","Computer science","Engineering","Business","Management system"],"sdg_mappings":[],"linked_datasets":[],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-08-06T19:17:13.958917Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}