{"doi":"10.2307/1966114","title":"Governmental Population Incentives: Ethical Issues at Stake","abstract":null,"journal":"Studies in Family Planning","year":1977,"id":675425,"datarank":1.4674497238361992,"base_score":2.70805020110221,"endowment":2.70805020110221,"self_citation_contribution":0.40620753016533157,"citation_network_contribution":1.0612421936708676,"self_endowment_contribution":0.40620753016533157,"citer_contribution":1.0612421936708676,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":14,"citer_count":13,"citers_with_citation_signal":10,"citers_with_endowment":10,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":1764745,"name":"Robert M. Veatch","orcid":null,"position":0,"is_corresponding":false}],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"resolved":true,"title":"Governmental Population Incentives: Ethical Issues at Stake","abstract":"Governmental incentives to influence population-related decisions are examined in terms of the ethical issues at stake. A typology of incentive schemes is presented, and ethical implications of various incentives are discussed. It is argued that, in a just scheme, a progressive, negative incentive or fee, calculated as a surtax on a modified income tax or an equivalent standard, would distribute burdens equally. A set of guidelines for ethical evaluation of incentive schemes is proposed.","is_dataset_classified":null,"base_score":2.70805020110221,"endowment":2.70805020110221,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"850928","pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W2053965941","authors":[],"funders":[],"total_grants":0,"fwci":2.8225,"citation_percentile":0.90405434,"influential_citations":0,"citation_trend":[{"year":2014,"count":1},{"year":2020,"count":1}],"oa_status":"closed","license":null,"oa_locations":[{"url":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1966114","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/850928","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Governmental+Population+Incentives:+Ethical+Issues+at+Stake&title=Studies+in+Family+Planning+&volume=8&issue=4&pages=100-108&date=1977&au=Veatch,+Robert+M","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10822/718674","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10822/776759","host_type":"repository"}],"fields_of_study":["Income, Poverty, and Inequality","Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","Global Health Care Issues"],"mesh_terms":["Contraception Behavior","Ethics, Medical","Fees, Medical","Government","Humans","Patient Acceptance of Health Care","Population Control","Social Justice","Time Factors","United States","Personal Autonomy","Ethical Theory","Disclosure"],"keywords":["Incentive","Public economics","Typology","Population","Business","Actuarial science","Economics","Microeconomics","Sociology","Environmental health","Medicine"],"sdg_mappings":[],"linked_datasets":[],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-08-17T00:32:05.059177Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}