{"doi":"10.12968/bjon.2021.30.11.666","title":"Placement of finger oximeter on the ear: comparison with oxygen saturation values taken from the finger","abstract":" Pulse oximetry is widely used to assess oxygen saturation (SpO2) in order to guide patient care and monitor the response to treatment. However, inappropriate oximeter probe placement has been shown to affect the measured oximetry values in healthy and normoxic outpatients. This study evaluated how treatment decisions might be impacted by SpO2 values obtained using a finger probe placed on the pinna of the ear in a cohort of 46 patients receiving non-invasive ventilation compared with values obtained from a probe on the finger and the results of arterial blood gas (ABG) (SaO2) analysis. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to evaluate agreement between the methods. Finger probe saturation was not statistically different from SaO2, with a mean difference of -0.66% (P>0.05). Saturation from the ear was significantly different (-4.29%; P<0.001). Subgroup analysis in hypoxic patients (SaO2<90%) showed a significant difference between ABG SaO2, and finger and ear SpO2. The study provides evidence that placement of a finger probe on the ear is unsafe clinical practice, potentially leading to patient mismanagement. ","journal":"British Journal of Nursing","year":2021,"id":628689,"datarank":0.24141568686511508,"base_score":1.6094379124341003,"endowment":1.6094379124341003,"self_citation_contribution":0.24141568686511508,"citation_network_contribution":0.0,"self_endowment_contribution":0.24141568686511508,"citer_contribution":0.0,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":4,"citer_count":0,"citers_with_citation_signal":0,"citers_with_endowment":0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":1627830,"name":"Edward Parkes","orcid":null,"position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1627831,"name":"Catherine Gilsenan","orcid":null,"position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1224074,"name":"Asad Ali","orcid":"0000-0002-9327-1285","position":3,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1627829,"name":"Joanna Shakespeare","orcid":null,"position":0,"is_corresponding":false}],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"resolved":true,"title":"Placement of finger oximeter on the ear: comparison with oxygen saturation values taken from the finger","abstract":" Pulse oximetry is widely used to assess oxygen saturation (SpO2) in order to guide patient care and monitor the response to treatment. However, inappropriate oximeter probe placement has been shown to affect the measured oximetry values in healthy and normoxic outpatients. This study evaluated how treatment decisions might be impacted by SpO2 values obtained using a finger probe placed on the pinna of the ear in a cohort of 46 patients receiving non-invasive ventilation compared with values obtained from a probe on the finger and the results of arterial blood gas (ABG) (SaO2) analysis. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to evaluate agreement between the methods. Finger probe saturation was not statistically different from SaO2, with a mean difference of -0.66% (P>0.05). Saturation from the ear was significantly different (-4.29%; P<0.001). Subgroup analysis in hypoxic patients (SaO2<90%) showed a significant difference between ABG SaO2, and finger and ear SpO2. The study provides evidence that placement of a finger probe on the ear is unsafe clinical practice, potentially leading to patient mismanagement. ","is_dataset_classified":null,"base_score":1.6094379124341003,"endowment":1.6094379124341003,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"34109812","pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W3172110902","authors":[],"funders":[],"total_grants":0,"fwci":0.4325,"citation_percentile":0.6410766,"influential_citations":0,"citation_trend":[{"year":2022,"count":1},{"year":2023,"count":1},{"year":2024,"count":1},{"year":2025,"count":1}],"oa_status":"closed","license":null,"oa_locations":[{"url":"http://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/pdf/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.11.666","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.11.666","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34109812","host_type":"repository"}],"fields_of_study":["Respiratory Support and Mechanisms","Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring","Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy","Blood Gas Analysis","Humans","Hypoxia","Monitoring, Physiologic","Oximetry","Oxygen"],"mesh_terms":["Hypoxia","Blood Gas Analysis","Humans","Monitoring, Physiologic","Oximetry","Oxygen"],"keywords":["Pulse oximetry","Medicine","Oxygen saturation","Otology","Anesthesia","Pulse (music)","Significant difference","Audiology","Surgery","Internal medicine","Oxygen","Respiratory system","Clinical Decision Support Systems","Hypoxaemia","Non-invasive Ventilation","Diagnostic Techniques"],"sdg_mappings":[{"sdg_number":0,"sdg_label":"Good health and well-being"}],"linked_datasets":[],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-08-05T14:38:27.972669Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}