{"doi":"10.1161/jaha.118.009754","title":"Assessing Baseline and Temporal Changes in Cardiometabolic Risk Using Metabolic Syndrome Severity and Common Risk Scores","abstract":"<jats:sec xml:lang=\"en\">\n                    <jats:title>Background</jats:title>\n                    <jats:p xml:lang=\"en\">\n                      Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      ) is considered a cardiovascular disease (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      ) risk equivalent, thereby linking assessment of cardiometabolic risk with that of\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      risk over time. Our goal was to determine how commonly used\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      risk scores and metabolic syndrome (MetS) severity performed in predicting T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      with and without ultimate\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      .\n                    </jats:p>\n                  </jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec xml:lang=\"en\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods and Results</jats:title>\n                    <jats:p xml:lang=\"en\">\n                      We assessed data from 8273 participants of the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) Study, using the pooled cohort atherosclerotic\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      risk score, the Framingham Risk Score, and a MetS severity\n                      <jats:italic>Z</jats:italic>\n                      score to assess their association with future risk for\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      alone, T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      alone, or both over 20 years of follow‐up. Baseline levels of all scores were significantly associated with isolated incident T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      (odds ratios [\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content>\n                      s] for each 1‐\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SD</jats:styled-content>\n                      increase: atherosclerotic\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      =1.7, Framingham risk score=1.7, MetS\n                      <jats:italic>Z</jats:italic>\n                      score=5.1). All 3 baseline scores were also significantly associated with isolated incident\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      (atherosclerotic\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD OR</jats:styled-content>\n                      =2.4, Framingham risk score\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content>\n                      =2.3, MetS\n                      <jats:italic>Z</jats:italic>\n                      ‐score\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content>\n                      =1.8), with the 2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      scores remaining significant independent of MetS severity. MetS severity was strongly associated with future T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      leading to\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      (MetS\n                      <jats:italic>Z</jats:italic>\n                      ‐score\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content>\n                      =7.0, atherosclerotic\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD OR</jats:styled-content>\n                      =3.9, Framingham risk score\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content>\n                      =3.5). Furthermore, changes in MetS severity were independently associated with future T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      ‐\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      progression.\n                    </jats:p>\n                  </jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec xml:lang=\"en\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title>\n                    <jats:p xml:lang=\"en\">\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      risk scores are associated with risk for future isolated T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      in addition to isolated\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      . However, MetS severity (both baseline and changes over time) was more strongly associated with T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      , including T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      ultimately leading to\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      . Following MetS severity within patients over time may identify those at greatest risk of combined cardiometabolic disease.\n                    </jats:p>\n                  </jats:sec>","journal":"Journal of the American Heart Association","year":2018,"id":634220,"datarank":0.5416376868966337,"base_score":3.6109179126442243,"endowment":3.6109179126442243,"self_citation_contribution":0.5416376868966337,"citation_network_contribution":0.0,"self_endowment_contribution":0.5416376868966337,"citer_contribution":0.0,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":36,"citer_count":0,"citers_with_citation_signal":0,"citers_with_endowment":0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":363711,"name":"Stephanie L. Filipp","orcid":"0009-0009-9901-566X","position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":502305,"name":"Thomas A. Pearson","orcid":null,"position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":426461,"name":"Mark D. DeBoer","orcid":"0000-0003-1462-591X","position":3,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":363710,"name":"Matthew J. Gurka","orcid":"0000-0002-3371-4582","position":0,"is_corresponding":false}],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"resolved":true,"title":"Assessing Baseline and Temporal Changes in Cardiometabolic Risk Using Metabolic Syndrome Severity and Common Risk Scores","abstract":"<jats:sec xml:lang=\"en\">\n                    <jats:title>Background</jats:title>\n                    <jats:p xml:lang=\"en\">\n                      Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      ) is considered a cardiovascular disease (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      ) risk equivalent, thereby linking assessment of cardiometabolic risk with that of\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      risk over time. Our goal was to determine how commonly used\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      risk scores and metabolic syndrome (MetS) severity performed in predicting T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      with and without ultimate\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      .\n                    </jats:p>\n                  </jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec xml:lang=\"en\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods and Results</jats:title>\n                    <jats:p xml:lang=\"en\">\n                      We assessed data from 8273 participants of the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) Study, using the pooled cohort atherosclerotic\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      risk score, the Framingham Risk Score, and a MetS severity\n                      <jats:italic>Z</jats:italic>\n                      score to assess their association with future risk for\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      alone, T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      alone, or both over 20 years of follow‐up. Baseline levels of all scores were significantly associated with isolated incident T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      (odds ratios [\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content>\n                      s] for each 1‐\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SD</jats:styled-content>\n                      increase: atherosclerotic\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      =1.7, Framingham risk score=1.7, MetS\n                      <jats:italic>Z</jats:italic>\n                      score=5.1). All 3 baseline scores were also significantly associated with isolated incident\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      (atherosclerotic\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD OR</jats:styled-content>\n                      =2.4, Framingham risk score\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content>\n                      =2.3, MetS\n                      <jats:italic>Z</jats:italic>\n                      ‐score\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content>\n                      =1.8), with the 2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      scores remaining significant independent of MetS severity. MetS severity was strongly associated with future T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      leading to\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      (MetS\n                      <jats:italic>Z</jats:italic>\n                      ‐score\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content>\n                      =7.0, atherosclerotic\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD OR</jats:styled-content>\n                      =3.9, Framingham risk score\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content>\n                      =3.5). Furthermore, changes in MetS severity were independently associated with future T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      ‐\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      progression.\n                    </jats:p>\n                  </jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec xml:lang=\"en\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title>\n                    <jats:p xml:lang=\"en\">\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      risk scores are associated with risk for future isolated T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      in addition to isolated\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      . However, MetS severity (both baseline and changes over time) was more strongly associated with T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      , including T2\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">DM</jats:styled-content>\n                      ultimately leading to\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CVD</jats:styled-content>\n                      . Following MetS severity within patients over time may identify those at greatest risk of combined cardiometabolic disease.\n                    </jats:p>\n                  </jats:sec>","is_dataset_classified":null,"base_score":3.6109179126442243,"endowment":3.6109179126442243,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"30369320","pmcid":"PMC6201393","openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W2891168675","authors":[],"funders":[{"funder_name":"NHLBI NIH HHS","grant_id":"R01 HL120960","title":null},{"funder_name":"NIGMS NIH HHS","grant_id":"U54 GM104942","title":null},{"funder_name":"NHLBI NIH HHS","grant_id":"HHSN268201100012C","title":null},{"funder_name":"National Institutes of Health","grant_id":"5R01HL120960-02","title":"An Ethnicity-Specific MetS Severity Score to Assess Risk: The Jackson Heart Study"},{"funder_name":"National Institutes of Health","grant_id":"3U54GM104942-05S3","title":"Developing novel strategies to increase COVID-19 testing among underserved and vulnerable populations in West Virginia through community and state partnerships"},{"funder_name":"National Institutes of Health","grant_id":"2U54GM104942-02","title":"West Virginia Clinical and Translational Science Institute: Improving Health through Partnerships and Transformative Research"}],"total_grants":6,"fwci":1.8011,"citation_percentile":0.86222568,"influential_citations":0,"citation_trend":[{"year":2018,"count":2},{"year":2019,"count":3},{"year":2020,"count":3},{"year":2021,"count":4},{"year":2022,"count":6},{"year":2023,"count":4},{"year":2024,"count":4},{"year":2025,"count":4},{"year":2026,"count":6}],"oa_status":"gold","license":"cc-by-nc-nd","oa_locations":[{"url":"https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1161/JAHA.118.009754","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1161/JAHA.118.009754","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/JAHA.118.009754","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.118.009754","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30369320","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"https://doaj.org/article/cbb8ac2607de4955942ddcc27c0934eb","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"http://europepmc.org/pmc/articles/PMC6201393","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6201393","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6201393","host_type":"Europe_PMC"},{"url":"https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6201393?pdf=render","host_type":"Europe_PMC"},{"url":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009754","host_type":""},{"url":"https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/jaha.118.009754","host_type":""}],"fields_of_study":["Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins","Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors","Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment","03 medical and health sciences","0302 clinical medicine"],"mesh_terms":["Blood Glucose","Blood Pressure","Cardiovascular Diseases","Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2","Female","Humans","Cholesterol, HDL","Cholesterol, LDL","Male","Middle Aged","Severity of Illness Index","Triglycerides","Cohort Studies","Odds Ratio","Risk Assessment","Metabolic Syndrome","Waist Circumference"],"keywords":["Medicine","Framingham Risk Score","Internal medicine","Metabolic syndrome","Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities","Diabetes mellitus","Cohort","Odds ratio","Risk assessment","Disease","Obesity","Endocrinology","Prediction","Type 2 diabetes mellitus","Cardiovascular disease","Blood Glucose","Male","Blood Pressure","Severity of Illness Index","Cohort Studies","Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system","Humans","Triglycerides","Original Research","Cholesterol, HDL","Cholesterol, LDL","Middle Aged","Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2","Cardiovascular Diseases","RC666-701","Female","Waist Circumference"],"sdg_mappings":[{"sdg_number":3,"sdg_label":"3. Good health"},{"sdg_number":0,"sdg_label":"Good health and well-being"}],"linked_datasets":[],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-08-06T13:20:05.986780Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}