{"doi":"10.1155/2013/931698","title":"Enhanced Cognitive Walkthrough: Development of the Cognitive Walkthrough Method to Better Predict, Identify, and Present Usability Problems","abstract":"<jats:p>To avoid use errors when handling medical equipment, it is important to develop products with a high degree of usability. This can be achieved by performing usability evaluations in the product development process to detect and mitigate potential usability problems. A commonly used method is cognitive walkthrough (CW), but this method shows three weaknesses: poor high-level perspective, insufficient categorisation of detected usability problems, and difficulties in overviewing the analytical results. This paper presents a further development of CW with the aim of overcoming its weaknesses. The new method is called enhanced cognitive walkthrough (ECW). ECW is a proactive analytical method for analysis of potential usability problems. The ECW method has been employed to evaluate user interface designs of medical equipment such as home-care ventilators, infusion pumps, dialysis machines, and insulin pumps. The method has proved capable of identifying several potential use problems in designs.</jats:p>","journal":"Advances in Human-Computer Interaction","year":2013,"id":27924,"datarank":3.3116213881515604,"base_score":4.31748811353631,"endowment":4.31748811353631,"self_citation_contribution":0.6476232170304466,"citation_network_contribution":2.663998171121114,"self_endowment_contribution":0.6476232170304466,"citer_contribution":2.663998171121114,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":74,"citer_count":59,"citers_with_citation_signal":45,"citers_with_endowment":45,"datacite_reuse_total":18,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":157797,"name":"Anna-Lisa Osvalder","orcid":null,"position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":157796,"name":"Lars-Ola Bligård","orcid":"0000-0003-0418-679X","position":0,"is_corresponding":false}],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"base_score":4.31748811353631,"endowment":4.31748811353631,"datacite_reuse_total":18,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"24523987","pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W2074878819","authors":[],"funders":[],"total_grants":0,"fwci":2.1719,"citation_percentile":0.89870875,"influential_citations":2,"citation_trend":[{"year":2014,"count":1},{"year":2015,"count":1},{"year":2016,"count":1},{"year":2017,"count":3},{"year":2018,"count":2},{"year":2019,"count":6},{"year":2020,"count":4},{"year":2021,"count":9},{"year":2022,"count":11},{"year":2023,"count":18},{"year":2024,"count":15},{"year":2025,"count":2},{"year":2026,"count":1}],"oa_status":"gold","license":"cc-by","oa_locations":[{"url":"https://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ahci/2013/931698.pdf","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"https://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ahci/2013/931698.pdf","host_type":"GOLD"},{"url":"https://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ahci/2013/931698.pdf","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ahci/2013/931698.pdf","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ahci/2013/931698.xml","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/931698","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"https://doaj.org/article/9349b717d387435dadd0cdd296621b48","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/publication/185405-enhanced-cognitive-walkthrough-development-of-the-cognitive-walkthrough-method-to-better-predict-ide","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"https://research.chalmers.se/en/publication/185405","host_type":"repository"}],"fields_of_study":["Quality Function Deployment in Product Design","Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring","Computer Science","Engineering","Medicine"],"mesh_terms":[],"keywords":["Usability","Cognitive walkthrough","Software walkthrough","Computer science","Usability inspection","Heuristic evaluation","Human–computer interaction","Pluralistic walkthrough","Usability engineering","Usability goals","Perspective (graphical)","Artificial intelligence","Software","Software development"],"sdg_mappings":[],"linked_datasets":[{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.15000105.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of The Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS): a pragmatic method for assessing implementation strategy usability","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.15000105","title":"Additional file 1 of The Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS): a pragmatic method for assessing implementation strategy usability","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.15000108.v1","title":"Additional file 2 of The Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS): a pragmatic method for assessing implementation strategy usability","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.15000108","title":"Additional file 2 of The Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS): a pragmatic method for assessing implementation strategy usability","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.15000111.v1","title":"Additional file 3 of The Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS): a pragmatic method for assessing implementation strategy usability","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.15000111","title":"Additional file 3 of The Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS): a pragmatic method for assessing implementation strategy usability","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.15000114.v1","title":"Additional file 4 of The Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS): a pragmatic method for assessing implementation strategy usability","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.15000114","title":"Additional file 4 of The Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS): a pragmatic method for assessing implementation strategy usability","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.26565096.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.26565096","title":"Additional file 1 of Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.26565099.v1","title":"Additional file 2 of Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.26565099","title":"Additional file 2 of Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.26565102.v1","title":"Additional file 3 of Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.26565102","title":"Additional file 3 of Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.26565105.v1","title":"Additional file 4 of Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.26565105","title":"Additional file 4 of Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.26565108.v1","title":"Additional file 5 of Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.26565108","title":"Additional file 5 of Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"}],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-06-08T19:56:50.034161Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}