{"doi":"10.1121/1.2018258","title":"Perceptual information for voicing of postvocalic fricatives","abstract":"<jats:p>As voicing in a word-final fricative varies, the duration and the internal temporal and spectral structure of a preceding vowel also vary. We examined the importance of vowel structure variations as a fricative voicing cue. Stimuli were prepared by computer editing of vowel nuclei from utterances [jus] and [juz] which lacked final first formant transitions and differed in both vowel duration and structure. Durations were systematically varied from 350–550 ms to produce pairs of vowel nuclei with equal durations and different structures. Duration of unvoiced friction was also varied from 100–250 ms making a total of 40 stimuli. Identification responses to these stimuli by 15 listeners revealed that friction duration was a weak voicing cue, while vowel duration functioned as a much more effective voicing cue, replicating previous findings [P. Denes, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 761–764 (1955)]. However, vowel structure was also a strong voicing cue, having a greater perceptual effect than 50 ms changes in duration. Acoustic analyses of the experimental stimuli suggested that proportional durations of the formant transitions and total vowel duration together specify voicing information.</jats:p>","journal":"The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","year":1980,"id":662802,"datarank":0.0,"base_score":0.0,"endowment":0.0,"self_citation_contribution":0.0,"citation_network_contribution":0.0,"self_endowment_contribution":0.0,"citer_contribution":0.0,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":0,"citer_count":0,"citers_with_citation_signal":0,"citers_with_endowment":0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":1730378,"name":"Ann D. Lassalle","orcid":null,"position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1730379,"name":"Walter Summers","orcid":null,"position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":512203,"name":"Sigfrid D. Soli","orcid":"0000-0002-3214-4450","position":0,"is_corresponding":false}],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"resolved":true,"title":"Perceptual information for voicing of postvocalic fricatives","abstract":"<jats:p>As voicing in a word-final fricative varies, the duration and the internal temporal and spectral structure of a preceding vowel also vary. We examined the importance of vowel structure variations as a fricative voicing cue. Stimuli were prepared by computer editing of vowel nuclei from utterances [jus] and [juz] which lacked final first formant transitions and differed in both vowel duration and structure. Durations were systematically varied from 350–550 ms to produce pairs of vowel nuclei with equal durations and different structures. Duration of unvoiced friction was also varied from 100–250 ms making a total of 40 stimuli. Identification responses to these stimuli by 15 listeners revealed that friction duration was a weak voicing cue, while vowel duration functioned as a much more effective voicing cue, replicating previous findings [P. Denes, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 761–764 (1955)]. However, vowel structure was also a strong voicing cue, having a greater perceptual effect than 50 ms changes in duration. Acoustic analyses of the experimental stimuli suggested that proportional durations of the formant transitions and total vowel duration together specify voicing information.</jats:p>","is_dataset_classified":null,"base_score":0.0,"endowment":0.0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"19162232","pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W2035225705","authors":[],"funders":[],"total_grants":0,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"citation_trend":[],"oa_status":"bronze","license":null,"oa_locations":[{"url":"https://asa.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1121/1.2018258","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"https://asa.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1121/1.2018258","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://pubs.aip.org/asa/jasa/article-pdf/67/S1/S50/12009999/s50_4_online.pdf","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2018258","host_type":"journal"}],"fields_of_study":["Phonetics and Phonology Research","Music Technology and Sound Studies","Neuroscience and Music Perception"],"mesh_terms":[],"keywords":["Voice","Vowel","Duration (music)","Formant","Acoustics","Perception","Audiology","Voice-onset time","Speech recognition","Mid vowel","Mathematics","Psychology","Computer science","Physics","Medicine"],"sdg_mappings":[{"sdg_number":0,"sdg_label":"Quality Education"}],"linked_datasets":[],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-08-12T17:30:37.272017Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}