{"doi":"10.1111/j.1472-765x.2008.02408.x","title":"Development of a real-time PCR method for<i>Firmicutes</i>and<i>Bacteroidetes</i>in faeces and its application to quantify intestinal population of obese and lean pigs","abstract":null,"journal":"Letters in Applied Microbiology","year":2008,"id":33777,"datarank":15.615868924648598,"base_score":6.2324480165505225,"endowment":6.2324480165505225,"self_citation_contribution":0.9348672024825785,"citation_network_contribution":14.68100172216602,"self_endowment_contribution":0.9348672024825785,"citer_contribution":14.68100172216602,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":508,"citer_count":200,"citers_with_citation_signal":200,"citers_with_endowment":200,"datacite_reuse_total":24,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":136173,"name":"X. Xia","orcid":null,"position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":110447,"name":"R. Tang","orcid":"0000-0003-0364-6280","position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":141152,"name":"J. Zhou","orcid":null,"position":3,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":27184,"name":"H. Zhao","orcid":"0000-0002-6638-847X","position":4,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":176072,"name":"K. Wang","orcid":null,"position":5,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":43777,"name":"X. Guo","orcid":"0009-0000-4180-9568","position":0,"is_corresponding":false}],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"base_score":6.2324480165505225,"endowment":6.2324480165505225,"datacite_reuse_total":24,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"19146523","pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W1995878063","authors":[],"funders":[],"total_grants":0,"fwci":5.1178,"citation_percentile":0.96123696,"influential_citations":29,"citation_trend":[{"year":2012,"count":20},{"year":2013,"count":32},{"year":2014,"count":30},{"year":2015,"count":37},{"year":2016,"count":38},{"year":2017,"count":37},{"year":2018,"count":33},{"year":2019,"count":34},{"year":2020,"count":35},{"year":2021,"count":43},{"year":2022,"count":43},{"year":2023,"count":47},{"year":2024,"count":19},{"year":2025,"count":18},{"year":2026,"count":4}],"oa_status":"closed","license":"http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1","oa_locations":[{"url":"https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1472-765X.2008.02408.x","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02408.x/fullpdf","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765x.2008.02408.x","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19146523","host_type":"repository"}],"fields_of_study":["Gut microbiota and health","Animal Nutrition and Physiology","Probiotics and Fermented Foods","Biology","Medicine","Agricultural and Food Sciences","Animals","Bacteroidetes","Colony Count, Microbial","DNA Primers","Feces","Gastrointestinal Tract","Gram-Positive Bacteria","Obesity","Polymerase Chain Reaction","RNA, Ribosomal, 16S","Sensitivity and Specificity","Swine"],"mesh_terms":["Animals","Feces","Gram-Positive Bacteria","Obesity","RNA, Ribosomal, 16S","Sensitivity and Specificity","Swine","Colony Count, Microbial","Polymerase Chain Reaction","DNA Primers","Bacteroidetes","Gastrointestinal Tract"],"keywords":["Bacteroidetes","Firmicutes","Bacteroides","Biology","Bacteroidaceae","Gut flora","Feces","Microbiology","Bacteria","16S ribosomal RNA","Food science","Immunology","Genetics"],"sdg_mappings":[],"linked_datasets":[{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.13324202.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Effects of Bacillus subtilis on growth performance, serum parameters, digestive enzyme, intestinal morphology, and colonic microbiota in piglets","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.13324202","title":"Additional file 1 of Effects of Bacillus subtilis on growth performance, serum parameters, digestive enzyme, intestinal morphology, and colonic microbiota in piglets","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14721812.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Human microbiota modulation via QseC sensor kinase mediated in the Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak strain infection in microbiome model","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14721812","title":"Additional file 1 of Human microbiota modulation via QseC sensor kinase mediated in the Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak strain infection in microbiome model","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14752070.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Effect of the standard herbal preparation, STW5, treatment on dysbiosis induced by dextran sodium sulfate in experimental colitis","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14752070","title":"Additional file 1 of Effect of the standard herbal preparation, STW5, treatment on dysbiosis induced by dextran sodium sulfate in experimental colitis","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304914.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304914","title":"Additional file 1 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304917.v1","title":"Additional file 2 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304917","title":"Additional file 2 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304920.v1","title":"Additional file 3 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304920","title":"Additional file 3 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304923.v1","title":"Additional file 4 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304923","title":"Additional file 4 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304926.v1","title":"Additional file 5 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304926","title":"Additional file 5 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304929.v1","title":"Additional file 6 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304929","title":"Additional file 6 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304932.v1","title":"Additional file 7 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304932","title":"Additional file 7 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304935.v1","title":"Additional file 8 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304935","title":"Additional file 8 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304938.v1","title":"Additional file 9 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23304938","title":"Additional file 9 of Cefquinome shows a higher impact on the pig gut microbiome and resistome compared to ceftiofur","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"}],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-06-09T16:53:52.951946Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}