{"doi":"10.1109/apcc.2006.255891","title":"Forgery Attack on a Signature Scheme with Message Recovery","abstract":null,"journal":"2006 Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications","year":2006,"id":629429,"datarank":0.0,"base_score":0.0,"endowment":0.0,"self_citation_contribution":0.0,"citation_network_contribution":0.0,"self_endowment_contribution":0.0,"citer_contribution":0.0,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":0,"citer_count":0,"citers_with_citation_signal":0,"citers_with_endowment":0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":1630121,"name":"Congwei Xu","orcid":null,"position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1630120,"name":"Baozheng Yu","orcid":null,"position":0,"is_corresponding":false}],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"resolved":true,"title":"Forgery Attack on a Signature Scheme with Message Recovery","abstract":"Recently, M. Sekhar gave a digital signature scheme with message recovery, where only a specific verifier can directly check the validity of the signature. A third party can distinguish a valid signature through a zero-knowledge proof protocol. However we find that the proposed scheme is insecure. A forgery attack strategy on M. Sekhar's scheme has been designed; anyone who has a valid signature can forge a signature on an arbitrary message. An improved signature scheme, which can resist the forgery attack and a zero-knowledge proof protocol with which a third party can distinguish a valid signature are presented. Also, the security of the improved scheme is analyzed","is_dataset_classified":null,"base_score":0.0,"endowment":0.0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"19910364","pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W2054978354","authors":[],"funders":[],"total_grants":0,"fwci":0.0,"citation_percentile":0.14245059,"influential_citations":0,"citation_trend":[],"oa_status":"closed","license":null,"oa_locations":[{"url":"http://xplorestaging.ieee.org/ielx5/4023009/4023010/04023196.pdf?arnumber=4023196","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://doi.org/10.1109/apcc.2006.255891","host_type":""}],"fields_of_study":["Cryptography and Data Security","Advanced Authentication Protocols Security","Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic"],"mesh_terms":[],"keywords":["Digital signature","Ring signature","Signature (topology)","ElGamal signature scheme","Merkle signature scheme","Computer science","Scheme (mathematics)","Computer security","Protocol (science)","Blind signature","Schnorr signature","Digital Signature Algorithm","Zero-knowledge proof","Theoretical computer science","Cryptography","Mathematics"],"sdg_mappings":[{"sdg_number":0,"sdg_label":"Peace, Justice and strong institutions"}],"linked_datasets":[],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-08-05T18:35:12.240118Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}