{"doi":"10.1098/rspb.2014.2568","title":"The relative efficiency of modular and non-modular networks of different size","abstract":"<jats:p>Most biological networks are modular but previous work with small model networks has indicated that modularity does not necessarily lead to increased functional efficiency. Most biological networks are large, however, and here we examine the relative functional efficiency of modular and non-modular neural networks at a range of sizes. We conduct a detailed analysis of efficiency in networks of two size classes: ‘small’ and ‘large’, and a less detailed analysis across a range of network sizes. The former analysis reveals that while the modular network is less efficient than one of the two non-modular networks considered when networks are small, it is usually equally or more efficient than both non-modular networks when networks are large. The latter analysis shows that in networks of small to intermediate size, modular networks are much more efficient that non-modular networks of the same (low) connective density. If connective density must be kept low to reduce energy needs for example, this could promote modularity. We have shown how relative functionality/performance scales with network size, but the precise nature of evolutionary relationship between network size and prevalence of modularity will depend on the costs of connectivity.</jats:p>","journal":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","year":2015,"id":591452,"datarank":1.30951550262867,"base_score":3.332204510175204,"endowment":3.332204510175204,"self_citation_contribution":0.49983067652628066,"citation_network_contribution":0.8096848261023893,"self_endowment_contribution":0.49983067652628066,"citer_contribution":0.8096848261023893,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":27,"citer_count":26,"citers_with_citation_signal":23,"citers_with_endowment":23,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":1513287,"name":"Luke McNally","orcid":null,"position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1513286,"name":"Colin R. Tosh","orcid":null,"position":0,"is_corresponding":false}],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"resolved":true,"title":"The relative efficiency of modular and non-modular networks of different size","abstract":"<jats:p>Most biological networks are modular but previous work with small model networks has indicated that modularity does not necessarily lead to increased functional efficiency. Most biological networks are large, however, and here we examine the relative functional efficiency of modular and non-modular neural networks at a range of sizes. We conduct a detailed analysis of efficiency in networks of two size classes: ‘small’ and ‘large’, and a less detailed analysis across a range of network sizes. The former analysis reveals that while the modular network is less efficient than one of the two non-modular networks considered when networks are small, it is usually equally or more efficient than both non-modular networks when networks are large. The latter analysis shows that in networks of small to intermediate size, modular networks are much more efficient that non-modular networks of the same (low) connective density. If connective density must be kept low to reduce energy needs for example, this could promote modularity. We have shown how relative functionality/performance scales with network size, but the precise nature of evolutionary relationship between network size and prevalence of modularity will depend on the costs of connectivity.</jats:p>","is_dataset_classified":null,"base_score":3.332204510175204,"endowment":3.332204510175204,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"25631996","pmcid":"PMC4344152","openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W2122405502","authors":[],"funders":[{"funder_name":"Natural Environment Research Council","grant_id":"NE/H015469/2","title":null},{"funder_name":"Wellcome Trust","grant_id":"095831","title":null},{"funder_name":"Natural Environment Research Council","grant_id":"NE/H015469/1","title":"The role of decision accuracy in the evolution of niche width"},{"funder_name":"Wellcome Trust","grant_id":"unidentified","title":"unidentified"}],"total_grants":4,"fwci":1.4682,"citation_percentile":0.8127013,"influential_citations":0,"citation_trend":[{"year":2015,"count":2},{"year":2016,"count":1},{"year":2017,"count":2},{"year":2018,"count":4},{"year":2019,"count":4},{"year":2020,"count":2},{"year":2021,"count":1},{"year":2022,"count":4},{"year":2023,"count":2},{"year":2024,"count":2},{"year":2025,"count":2},{"year":2026,"count":1}],"oa_status":"hybrid","license":"cc-by","oa_locations":[{"url":"https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.2014.2568","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.2014.2568","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rspb.2014.2568","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2568","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25631996","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4344152","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4344152","host_type":"Europe_PMC"},{"url":"https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4344152?pdf=render","host_type":"Europe_PMC"},{"url":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2568","host_type":""},{"url":"https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2568","host_type":""},{"url":"https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2568","host_type":""}],"fields_of_study":["Neural dynamics and brain function","Advanced Memory and Neural Computing","Gene Regulatory Network Analysis","0301 basic medicine","0303 health sciences","03 medical and health sciences"],"mesh_terms":["Computer Simulation","Biological Evolution","Nerve Net","Neural Networks, Computer"],"keywords":["Modularity (biology)","Modular design","Computer science","Range (aeronautics)","Efficient energy use","Distributed computing","Biology","Engineering","Ecology","Evolution","Simulation","Neural network","Modularity","Computer Simulation","Neural Networks, Computer","Nerve Net","Biological Evolution","Research Articles"],"sdg_mappings":[{"sdg_number":7,"sdg_label":"7. Clean energy"},{"sdg_number":11,"sdg_label":"11. Sustainability"},{"sdg_number":0,"sdg_label":"Affordable and clean energy"}],"linked_datasets":[],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-07-25T16:41:54.062251Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}