{"doi":"10.1093/g3journal/jkaa037","title":"Genome analysis of <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar Typhimurium bacteriophage L, indicator for StySA (StyLT2III) restriction-modification system action","abstract":"Bacteriophage L, a P22-like phage of Salmonella enterica sv Typhimurium LT2, was important for definition of mosaic organization of the lambdoid phage family and for characterization of restriction-modification systems of Salmonella. We report the complete genome sequences of bacteriophage L cI-40 13-am43 and L cII-101; the deduced sequence of wildtype L is 40,633 bp long with a 47.5% GC content. We compare this sequence with those of P22 and ST64T, and predict 72 Coding Sequences, 2 tRNA genes and 14 intergenic rho-independent transcription terminators. The overall genome organization of L agrees with earlier genetic and physical evidence; for example, no secondary immunity region (immI: ant, arc) or known genes for superinfection exclusion (sieA and sieB) are present. Proteomic analysis confirmed identification of virion proteins, along with low levels of assembly intermediates and host cell envelope proteins. The genome of L is 99.9% identical at the nucleotide level to that reported for phage ST64T, despite isolation on different continents ∼35 years apart. DNA modification by the epigenetic regulator Dam is generally incomplete. Dam modification is also selectively missing in one location, corresponding to the P22 phase-variation-sensitive promoter region of the serotype-converting gtrABC operon. The number of sites for SenLTIII (StySA) action may account for stronger restriction of L (13 sites) than of P22 (3 sites).","journal":"G3 Genes Genomes Genetics","year":2020,"id":88666,"datarank":0.3987697777842599,"base_score":2.3978952727983707,"endowment":2.3978952727983707,"self_citation_contribution":0.3596842909197557,"citation_network_contribution":0.039085486864504276,"self_endowment_contribution":0.3596842909197557,"citer_contribution":0.039085486864504276,"corpus_percentile":54.13475671076042,"corpus_rank":5930,"citation_count":10,"citer_count":3,"citers_with_citation_signal":2,"citers_with_endowment":2,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":true,"is_dataset_confidence":0.7991,"is_data_producer":true,"deposit_databanks":{"figshare":["10.25387/g3.13326164"]},"is_oa":true,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":"2020-01-01","fair_score":50.0,"fair_percentile":62.702537450321,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":449283,"name":"Colleen McClung","orcid":"0000-0002-0070-6033","position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":449284,"name":"Cristian Ruse","orcid":"0000-0001-8237-6308","position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":449285,"name":"Peter Weigele","orcid":"0000-0003-3696-4541","position":3,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":450262,"name":"Roger W. Hendrix","orcid":null,"position":4,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":449286,"name":"Ching‐Chung Ko","orcid":"0000-0002-8950-7128","position":5,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":372523,"name":"Robert H. Edgar","orcid":"0000-0002-3906-1930","position":6,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":307773,"name":"Graham F. Hatfull","orcid":"0000-0002-6705-6821","position":7,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":330730,"name":"Sherwood Casjens","orcid":"0000-0002-1213-7130","position":8,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":449287,"name":"Elisabeth A. Raleigh","orcid":"0000-0003-0745-9925","position":9,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":449282,"name":"Julie Zaworski","orcid":"0000-0003-4744-7208","position":0,"is_corresponding":true}],"reference_count":80,"raw_metadata":null,"created_at":"2026-07-18T22:01:22.387926Z","pmid":"33561243","pmcid":"PMC8022706","fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":72.2222,"fair_a":37.5,"fair_i":0.0,"fair_r":41.6667,"fair_zscore":0.6155,"fair_rationale":{"fair_score":50.0,"has_llm":true,"taxonomy_version":"fair_taxonomy_v5","dimensions":{"F":{"name":"Findable","score":72.22,"criteria":[{"key":"f_dataset_pid","label":"Persistent identifier for the data","kind":"llm","weight":2.0,"fraction":1.0,"verdict":"yes","evidence":"The phage L genome sequence and annotations have been deposited in GenBank (accession L_cI-40_13-am43 MW013502 and L_cII-101 MW013503 ).","grounded":true,"rationale":"The paper provides GenBank accessions (MW013502, MW013503), which are persistent identifiers in the repository accession scheme. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit","RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier'","FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'"],"scored":true,"signal":null},{"key":"f_repository_named","label":"Named repository","kind":"llm","weight":2.0,"fraction":1.0,"verdict":"yes","evidence":"Raw Pacific Bioscience RSII reads (SRR12424739) and Miseq Illumina raw reads (SRR12424740 and SRR12424741) have been deposited in the NCBI Bioproject PRJNA605961, and the raw dideoxy chain termination sequencing data for L cII – 101 has been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with accession number SRR8384267.","grounded":true,"rationale":"The paper names NCBI Bioproject, NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA), and GenBank as repositories holding the data. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed (","NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived","NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten"],"scored":true,"signal":null},{"key":"f_data_availability_statement","label":"Data-availability statement","kind":"llm","weight":2.0,"fraction":0.5,"verdict":"partial","evidence":null,"grounded":false,"rationale":"The statement points to repositories with accessions (Colavizza category 3). [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li","Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat","RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes"],"scored":false,"signal":null},{"key":"f_discovery_metadata","label":"Description of the dataset as an object","kind":"llm","weight":2.0,"fraction":0.5,"verdict":"partial","evidence":"Raw Pacific Bioscience RSII reads (SRR12424739) and Miseq Illumina raw reads (SRR12424740 and SRR12424741) have been deposited in the NCBI Bioproject PRJNA605961, and the raw dideoxy chain termination sequencing data for L cII – 101 has been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with accession number SRR8384267. The phage L genome sequence and annotations have been deposited in GenBank (accession L_cI-40_13-am43 MW013502 and L_cII-101 MW013503 ).","grounded":true,"rationale":"The dataset description is given in running prose in the Data availability section, not as a separate section, table, or enumerated list. [majority verdict 'partial' (2/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential)","FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability'","FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'"],"scored":false,"signal":null},{"key":"f_dataset_cited","label":"Dataset formally cited","kind":"llm","weight":1.0,"fraction":0.5,"verdict":"partial","evidence":"Raw Pacific Bioscience RSII reads (SRR12424739) and Miseq Illumina raw reads (SRR12424740 and SRR12424741) have been deposited in the NCBI Bioproject PRJNA605961, and the raw dideoxy chain termination sequencing data for L cII – 101 has been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with accession number SRR8384267. The phage L genome sequence and annotations have been deposited in GenBank (accession L_cI-40_13-am43 MW013502 and L_cII-101 MW013503 ).","grounded":true,"rationale":"The dataset identifiers (accessions) appear only in the body text (Data availability section), not in the reference list. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first-","RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes","FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'"],"scored":true,"signal":null}]},"A":{"name":"Accessible","score":37.5,"criteria":[{"key":"a_data_openly_accessible","label":"Access route free of preconditions","kind":"llm","weight":2.0,"fraction":0.5,"verdict":"partial","evidence":null,"grounded":false,"rationale":"The data are deposited in public repositories without stated precondition. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol'","FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data'","NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'"],"scored":true,"signal":null},{"key":"a_access_conditions_stated","label":"Access level labelled","kind":"llm","weight":1.0,"fraction":0.5,"verdict":"partial","evidence":"Raw Pacific Bioscience RSII reads (SRR12424739) and Miseq Illumina raw reads (SRR12424740 and SRR12424741) have been deposited in the NCBI Bioproject PRJNA605961, and the raw dideoxy chain termination sequencing data for L cII – 101 has been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with accession number SRR8384267.","grounded":true,"rationale":"The paper describes where the data can be accessed (deposited in NCBI repositories) but does not label the access level with a standard term like 'open access'. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data'","RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data","COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl"],"scored":false,"signal":null},{"key":"a_controlled_access_for_sensitive","label":"Gatekeeper for sensitive data","kind":"llm","weight":0.5,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":"Strains and variants are available upon request.","grounded":true,"rationale":"The data are bacteriophage genome sequences, not human-subject or sensitive data, and no gatekeeper is named for the primary data.","anchors":["NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee","RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and ","NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse"],"scored":false,"signal":null},{"key":"a_timeline_retention","label":"Availability timing & retention","kind":"llm","weight":0.5,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":null,"grounded":false,"rationale":"No statement about when the data are available or how long they persist. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines","NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy'","RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'"],"scored":false,"signal":null}]},"I":{"name":"Interoperable","score":0.0,"criteria":[{"key":"i_open_nonproprietary_format","label":"Open file format","kind":"llm","weight":1.0,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":null,"grounded":false,"rationale":"The paper does not name any file format for the deposited data.","anchors":["FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co","RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard","RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format"],"scored":true,"signal":null},{"key":"i_community_standard_vocabulary","label":"Community standard / vocabulary","kind":"llm","weight":1.0,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":null,"grounded":false,"rationale":"No community-standard vocabulary, checklist, or ontology is named as being applied to the data.","anchors":["RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential)","RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard'","RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'"],"scored":false,"signal":null},{"key":"i_qualified_references","label":"Identifiers for the resources the data depend on","kind":"llm","weight":0.5,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":"ST64T genome (AY052766)","grounded":false,"rationale":"The paper provides a GenBank accession (AY052766) for the ST64T genome, which is a resource other than the study's own dataset. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]","anchors":["RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data'","RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata'","FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'"],"scored":false,"signal":null}]},"R":{"name":"Reusable","score":41.67,"criteria":[{"key":"r_reuse_license","label":"Reuse licence","kind":"llm","weight":2.0,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":null,"grounded":false,"rationale":"The paper does not attach a license to the data; the CC BY license applies only to the article.","anchors":["RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu","RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence'","RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'"],"scored":true,"signal":null},{"key":"r_provenance_methods","label":"Provenance of the data","kind":"llm","weight":1.0,"fraction":1.0,"verdict":"yes","evidence":"An Illumina MiSeq device (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used to generate 75-bp pair-end reads.","grounded":true,"rationale":"The paper names specific instruments and software used to produce the data, including the Illumina MiSeq sequencer. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa","FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati","W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance"],"scored":false,"signal":null},{"key":"r_documentation_codebook","label":"Documentation / codebook","kind":"llm","weight":1.0,"fraction":1.0,"verdict":"yes","evidence":"File S1 in supplementary data contains the refined annotations, including name, type, inference method, start, stop, length, direction, sequence, putative product, and translation. File S2 contains the proteomic analysis spectral counts and protein IDs.","grounded":true,"rationale":"The paper names documentation objects (File S1, File S2) that accompany the data and define its contents. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu","FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'","NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t"],"scored":false,"signal":null},{"key":"r_versioning","label":"Snapshot identified","kind":"llm","weight":0.5,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":null,"grounded":false,"rationale":"No version token or date is provided to identify the snapshot of the data.","anchors":["DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property","RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance)","NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'"],"scored":true,"signal":null},{"key":"x_code_availability","label":"Analysis code available","kind":"llm","weight":1.0,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":null,"grounded":false,"rationale":"The paper does not mention the availability of any custom code or software written for the study.","anchors":["NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code'","FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear","FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)"],"scored":true,"signal":null},{"key":"x_funding_attribution","label":"Funder and award number","kind":"llm","weight":0.5,"fraction":1.0,"verdict":"yes","evidence":"This work was supported in part by NIH grant GM114817 to S.R.C.","grounded":true,"rationale":"The paper provides an award number (GM114817) from the NIH, a named funder. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award","Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata","RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco"],"scored":true,"signal":null}]}},"actions":[{"key":"r_reuse_license","dimension":"R","label":"Reuse licence","action":"Attach a standard, machine-readable open licence to the deposit — CC0 or CC BY, which is what Horizon Europe and most funders expect — and print the licence identifier in the paper. 'Free to use' is not a licence: it grants nothing a reuser's institution can rely on.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":null,"why":"The paper does not attach a license to the data; the CC BY license applies only to the article.","gain":16.67,"priority":"essential","scored":true},{"key":"a_data_openly_accessible","dimension":"A","label":"Access route free of preconditions","action":"Remove the precondition or justify it. Release the data at publication with no embargo, no registration wall, and no approval step — NIH's zero-embargo public- access rule (NOT-OD-25-101) has already made 'available at publication' the federal baseline for the article; the data should not lag behind it. For proteomics data, deposit in PRIDE (PXD accession) or ProteomeXchange.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"partial","current":0.5,"evidence":null,"why":"The data are deposited in public repositories without stated precondition. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]","gain":8.33,"priority":"essential","scored":true},{"key":"i_open_nonproprietary_format","dimension":"I","label":"Open file format","action":"Release the data in an open, community-standard format (CSV/TSV, JSON, HDF5, NetCDF, FASTQ, VCF, NIfTI…) instead of — or alongside — any proprietary or instrument-native format, and name the format in the paper. A dataset that needs a €2,000 licence to open is not reusable. Prefer open proteomics formats such as mzML or mzIdentML.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":null,"why":"The paper does not name any file format for the deposited data.","gain":8.33,"priority":"important","scored":true},{"key":"x_code_availability","dimension":"R","label":"Analysis code available","action":"Publish the analysis code in a public forge, archive a tagged release with a DOI (Zenodo/Software Heritage), and cite that DOI in the paper. NIH DMS Element 2 asks for the tools and code, not only the data — and 'available on request' is not a locator. Archive the analysis code in a versioned repository (GitHub + a Zenodo release DOI).","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":null,"why":"The paper does not mention the availability of any custom code or software written for the study.","gain":8.33,"priority":"important","scored":true},{"key":"f_dataset_cited","dimension":"F","label":"Dataset formally cited","action":"Cite the dataset in the reference list like a publication — creator, year, title, repository, DOI/accession — and cite it in-text where it is used. Only a reference- list entry is machine-readable to Crossref/DataCite, and only a citation lets the data earn credit. Cite the proteomics repository accession (e.g. from PRIDE (PXD accession) or ProteomeXchange) in the reference list.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"partial","current":0.5,"evidence":"Raw Pacific Bioscience RSII reads (SRR12424739) and Miseq Illumina raw reads (SRR12424740 and SRR12424741) have been deposited in the NCBI Bioproject PRJNA605961, and the raw dideoxy chain termination sequencing data for L cII – 101 has been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with accession number SRR8384267. The phage L genome sequence and annotations have been deposited in GenBank (accession L_cI-40_13-am43 MW013502 and L_cII-101 MW013503 ).","why":"The dataset identifiers (accessions) appear only in the body text (Data availability section), not in the reference list. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]","gain":4.17,"priority":"important","scored":true},{"key":"r_versioning","dimension":"R","label":"Snapshot identified","action":"Version the deposit and cite the exact version analysed (a version-specific DOI, or an accession with its version suffix). A reader reproducing your work against 'the current release' is reproducing it against a different dataset.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":null,"why":"No version token or date is provided to identify the snapshot of the data.","gain":4.17,"priority":"useful","scored":true},{"key":"f_data_availability_statement","dimension":"F","label":"Data-availability statement","action":"Replace the statement with the repository template: name the repository and give the accession or DOI (Colavizza category 3). This is the only DAS class associated with a measured citation advantage; 'available on reasonable request' and 'within the article' are not.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"partial","current":0.5,"evidence":null,"why":"The statement points to repositories with accessions (Colavizza category 3). [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]","gain":0.0,"priority":"essential","scored":false},{"key":"f_discovery_metadata","dimension":"F","label":"Description of the dataset as an object","action":"Add a 'Data Records' section: itemise every file in the deposit and every variable or sample it holds, with counts and units. Describe the dataset as an object in its own right, not as a by-product of the findings — this is what makes it discoverable to someone who is not looking for your paper.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"partial","current":0.5,"evidence":"Raw Pacific Bioscience RSII reads (SRR12424739) and Miseq Illumina raw reads (SRR12424740 and SRR12424741) have been deposited in the NCBI Bioproject PRJNA605961, and the raw dideoxy chain termination sequencing data for L cII – 101 has been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with accession number SRR8384267. The phage L genome sequence and annotations have been deposited in GenBank (accession L_cI-40_13-am43 MW013502 and L_cII-101 MW013503 ).","why":"The dataset description is given in running prose in the Data availability section, not as a separate section, table, or enumerated list. [majority verdict 'partial' (2/5 passes agreed)]","gain":0.0,"priority":"essential","scored":false},{"key":"a_access_conditions_stated","dimension":"A","label":"Access level labelled","action":"State the access level in words, using the standard vocabulary: 'These data are open access' / 'These data are controlled access'. A reader — and a harvester — should not have to infer the access level from the presence of a download link.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"partial","current":0.5,"evidence":"Raw Pacific Bioscience RSII reads (SRR12424739) and Miseq Illumina raw reads (SRR12424740 and SRR12424741) have been deposited in the NCBI Bioproject PRJNA605961, and the raw dideoxy chain termination sequencing data for L cII – 101 has been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with accession number SRR8384267.","why":"The paper describes where the data can be accessed (deposited in NCBI repositories) but does not label the access level with a standard term like 'open access'. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]","gain":0.0,"priority":"important","scored":false},{"key":"i_community_standard_vocabulary","dimension":"I","label":"Community standard / vocabulary","action":"Adopt and NAME your domain's data standard — the minimum-information checklist, metadata schema, or ontology your community uses (MIAME/MINSEQE, ISA-Tab, BIDS, an OBO ontology, HL7 FHIR/OMOP) — and say which one you followed. A reporting checklist standardises your paper; it does nothing for your data. In proteomics, describe the data with mzML or MIAPE.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":null,"why":"No community-standard vocabulary, checklist, or ontology is named as being applied to the data.","gain":0.0,"priority":"important","scored":false},{"key":"a_controlled_access_for_sensitive","dimension":"A","label":"Gatekeeper for sensitive data","action":"Route sensitive data through an institutional gatekeeper — deposit in a controlled- access repository (dbGaP, EGA) with a Data Access Committee and a published DUA — rather than through the corresponding author's inbox. An author-gated dataset dies with the author's email address, and 'on reasonable request' has been shown repeatedly not to yield data.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":"Strains and variants are available upon request.","why":"The data are bacteriophage genome sequences, not human-subject or sensitive data, and no gatekeeper is named for the primary data.","gain":0.0,"priority":"useful","scored":false},{"key":"i_qualified_references","dimension":"I","label":"Identifiers for the resources the data depend on","action":"Cite by identifier every resource the data depend on — the source datasets' accessions, the reference build (GRCh38 / GCA_000001405.28), the cohort application number, the code DOI — and register those relations on the dataset record (IsDerivedFrom, IsSupplementTo). A name is not a link: it cannot be resolved, versioned, or followed by a machine.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":"ST64T genome (AY052766)","why":"The paper provides a GenBank accession (AY052766) for the ST64T genome, which is a resource other than the study's own dataset. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]","gain":0.0,"priority":"useful","scored":false},{"key":"a_timeline_retention","dimension":"A","label":"Availability timing & retention","action":"State when the data become available AND how long they will be retained — cite the repository's preservation policy. NIH DMS Element 4 asks for both; most papers give neither.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":null,"why":"No statement about when the data are available or how long they persist. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]","gain":0.0,"priority":"useful","scored":false}],"suggestions":["Attach a standard, machine-readable open licence to the deposit — CC0 or CC BY, which is what Horizon Europe and most funders expect — and print the licence identifier in the paper. 'Free to use' is not a licence: it grants nothing a reuser's institution can rely on.","Remove the precondition or justify it. Release the data at publication with no embargo, no registration wall, and no approval step — NIH's zero-embargo public- access rule (NOT-OD-25-101) has already made 'available at publication' the federal baseline for the article; the data should not lag behind it. For proteomics data, deposit in PRIDE (PXD accession) or ProteomeXchange.","Release the data in an open, community-standard format (CSV/TSV, JSON, HDF5, NetCDF, FASTQ, VCF, NIfTI…) instead of — or alongside — any proprietary or instrument-native format, and name the format in the paper. A dataset that needs a €2,000 licence to open is not reusable. Prefer open proteomics formats such as mzML or mzIdentML.","Publish the analysis code in a public forge, archive a tagged release with a DOI (Zenodo/Software Heritage), and cite that DOI in the paper. NIH DMS Element 2 asks for the tools and code, not only the data — and 'available on request' is not a locator. Archive the analysis code in a versioned repository (GitHub + a Zenodo release DOI).","Cite the dataset in the reference list like a publication — creator, year, title, repository, DOI/accession — and cite it in-text where it is used. Only a reference- list entry is machine-readable to Crossref/DataCite, and only a citation lets the data earn credit. Cite the proteomics repository accession (e.g. from PRIDE (PXD accession) or ProteomeXchange) in the reference list."],"model":"deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash","agent_version":"fair_agent_v8","fulltext_source":"epmc_xml"},"fair_model":"deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash","fair_agent_version":"fair_agent_v8","fair_fulltext_source":"epmc_xml","fair_has_llm":true,"fair_computed_at":"2026-07-20T12:24:42.158265Z","clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}