{"doi":"10.1093/database/baaf045","title":"The state of the human coding gene catalogues","abstract":"In 2018, we analysed the three main repositories for the human proteome: Ensembl/GENCODE, RefSeq, and UniProtKB. At that time the three gene sets disagreed on the coding status of one of every eight annotated coding genes, and our results suggested that as many as 4234 of these genes might not be correctly classified. Here, we have repeated the analysis with updated versions of the three reference gene sets. Superficially, little appears to have changed. The three sets annotate 21 871 coding genes, slightly fewer than previously, and still disagree on the status of 2603 annotated genes, almost one in eight. However, we show that collaborations between the three reference gene sets have led to greater consensus. Reference catalogues have agreed on the coding status of another 249 genes since the last analysis while at least 700 genes have been reclassified. We still find that there are >2000 coding genes with at least one potential non-coding feature to indicate that they may not be coding genes. This includes a large majority of the 2603 genes for which annotators do not agree on coding status. In total, we believe that as many as 3000 genes may be misclassified as coding and could be annotated as non-coding genes, pseudogenes, or cancer antigens.","journal":"Database","year":2025,"id":531728,"datarank":0.24141568686511508,"base_score":1.6094379124341003,"endowment":1.6094379124341003,"self_citation_contribution":0.24141568686511508,"citation_network_contribution":0.0,"self_endowment_contribution":0.24141568686511508,"citer_contribution":0.0,"corpus_percentile":38.748356153786645,"corpus_rank":7799,"citation_count":4,"citer_count":1,"citers_with_citation_signal":0,"citers_with_endowment":0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":true,"is_dataset_confidence":0.9165,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":true,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":"2025-01-01","fair_score":12.5,"fair_percentile":28.767960868236013,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":642665,"name":"Daniel Cerdán-Vélez","orcid":"0000-0003-4499-6201","position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":285032,"name":"Michael L. Tress","orcid":"0000-0001-9046-6370","position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1198981,"name":"Miguel Maquedano","orcid":"0009-0001-2460-4429","position":0,"is_corresponding":true}],"reference_count":68,"raw_metadata":null,"created_at":"2026-07-19T02:51:18.928280Z","pmid":"40996716","pmcid":"PMC12462614","fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":0.0,"fair_a":25.0,"fair_i":20.0,"fair_r":33.3333,"fair_zscore":-0.8688,"fair_rationale":{"fair_score":12.5,"has_llm":true,"taxonomy_version":"fair_taxonomy_v5","dimensions":{"F":{"name":"Findable","score":0.0,"criteria":[{"key":"f_dataset_pid","label":"Persistent identifier for the data","kind":"llm","weight":2.0,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","grounded":false,"rationale":"The only locator given is a web URL (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/) and the supplementary material, neither of which is a persistent identifier scheme (DOI, Handle, ARK, URN, or repository accession). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]","anchors":["RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit","RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier'","FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'"],"scored":true,"signal":null},{"key":"f_repository_named","label":"Named repository","kind":"llm","weight":2.0,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","grounded":false,"rationale":"The study's own data are held in the journal's supplementary material (non-repository host) and future APPRIS, not a named repository. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (2/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed (","NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived","NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten"],"scored":true,"signal":null},{"key":"f_data_availability_statement","label":"Data-availability statement","kind":"llm","weight":2.0,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","grounded":false,"rationale":"The statement points to the article's supplementary material and a repository homepage, but does not provide a repository record with an accession or persistent identifier; it falls under Colavizza category 2 (data in article/supplement). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li","Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat","RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes"],"scored":false,"signal":null},{"key":"f_discovery_metadata","label":"Description of the dataset as an object","kind":"llm","weight":2.0,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","grounded":false,"rationale":"The paper describes the dataset's content only in a running prose sentence (the data-availability statement) without an itemised inventory, section, table, or list. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential)","FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability'","FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'"],"scored":false,"signal":null},{"key":"f_dataset_cited","label":"Dataset formally cited","kind":"llm","weight":1.0,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","grounded":false,"rationale":"The dataset identifier/link appears only in the body text (data-availability statement) and not in the reference list. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first-","RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes","FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'"],"scored":true,"signal":null}]},"A":{"name":"Accessible","score":25.0,"criteria":[{"key":"a_data_openly_accessible","label":"Access route free of preconditions","kind":"llm","weight":2.0,"fraction":0.5,"verdict":"partial","evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","grounded":false,"rationale":"The text gives a route to the data with no stated precondition (no embargo, registration, or request required). [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol'","FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data'","NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'"],"scored":true,"signal":null},{"key":"a_access_conditions_stated","label":"Access level labelled","kind":"llm","weight":1.0,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","grounded":false,"rationale":"The paper describes the action of accessing the data (supplementary material and APPRIS database) but applies no explicit access-level label such as 'open access'. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data'","RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data","COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl"],"scored":false,"signal":null},{"key":"a_controlled_access_for_sensitive","label":"Gatekeeper for sensitive data","kind":"llm","weight":0.5,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":null,"grounded":false,"rationale":"The data are not sensitive or human-subject; no gatekeeper is named, and the criterion is not applicable.","anchors":["NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee","RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and ","NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse"],"scored":false,"signal":null},{"key":"a_timeline_retention","label":"Availability timing & retention","kind":"llm","weight":0.5,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","grounded":false,"rationale":"The paper states that the data are available now (supplementary material) and will be available in the future (APPRIS), but says nothing about how long they persist. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines","NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy'","RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'"],"scored":false,"signal":null}]},"I":{"name":"Interoperable","score":20.0,"criteria":[{"key":"i_open_nonproprietary_format","label":"Open file format","kind":"llm","weight":1.0,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":null,"grounded":false,"rationale":"No file format is named for the released data; the supplementary material and APPRIS database do not specify a format.","anchors":["FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co","RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard","RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format"],"scored":true,"signal":null},{"key":"i_community_standard_vocabulary","label":"Community standard / vocabulary","kind":"llm","weight":1.0,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":null,"grounded":false,"rationale":"No data or metadata community standard (checklist, schema, ontology) is named for the study's own dataset; the paper uses standards in the analysis but not for the released data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential)","RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard'","RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'"],"scored":false,"signal":null},{"key":"i_qualified_references","label":"Identifiers for the resources the data depend on","kind":"llm","weight":0.5,"fraction":1.0,"verdict":"yes","evidence":"UP000005640","grounded":true,"rationale":"The paper gives the proteome identifier UP000005640 for the UniProtKB resource used, which is an identifier for a non-own resource.","anchors":["RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data'","RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata'","FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'"],"scored":false,"signal":null}]},"R":{"name":"Reusable","score":33.33,"criteria":[{"key":"r_reuse_license","label":"Reuse licence","kind":"llm","weight":2.0,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":null,"grounded":false,"rationale":"No license or terms document is named for the data; the article's CC-BY license applies to the paper, not the data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu","RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence'","RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'"],"scored":true,"signal":null},{"key":"r_provenance_methods","label":"Provenance of the data","kind":"llm","weight":1.0,"fraction":1.0,"verdict":"yes","evidence":"We downloaded the coding genes from the Ensembl 111/GENCODE v45 reference set from the BioMart tool","grounded":true,"rationale":"The paper names specific tools, versions, and databases used to produce the data (BioMart, Ensembl 111, GENCODE v45, etc.).","anchors":["RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa","FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati","W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance"],"scored":false,"signal":null},{"key":"r_documentation_codebook","label":"Documentation / codebook","kind":"llm","weight":1.0,"fraction":0.5,"verdict":"partial","evidence":"The most common explanations as to why these genes were not annotated as coding were that they were readthrough genes (669), were annotated or tagged as pseudogenes (484), were annotated as IG/TR fragments (429), were antisense to a coding gene (239), were annotated as lncRNA (217), or were retrovirus-derived (72).","grounded":true,"rationale":"Variable definitions (categories of non-coding status) are described inside the article, not in a separate documentation object shipped with the data. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu","FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'","NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t"],"scored":false,"signal":null},{"key":"r_versioning","label":"Snapshot identified","kind":"llm","weight":0.5,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":null,"grounded":false,"rationale":"No version token or date is given for the study's own dataset; the source versions are given but not the merged list. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]","anchors":["DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property","RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance)","NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'"],"scored":true,"signal":null},{"key":"x_code_availability","label":"Analysis code available","kind":"llm","weight":1.0,"fraction":0.0,"verdict":"no","evidence":null,"grounded":false,"rationale":"The study's own code is not mentioned; no locator is provided.","anchors":["NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code'","FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear","FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)"],"scored":true,"signal":null},{"key":"x_funding_attribution","label":"Funder and award number","kind":"llm","weight":0.5,"fraction":1.0,"verdict":"yes","evidence":"U41 HG007234","grounded":true,"rationale":"The paper provides the award number U41 HG007234 from the National Human Genome Research Institute.","anchors":["DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award","Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata","RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco"],"scored":true,"signal":null}]}},"actions":[{"key":"f_dataset_pid","dimension":"F","label":"Persistent identifier for the data","action":"Mint or cite a persistent identifier for the dataset — a repository DOI or an accession from a registered repository — and print it in the paper. A bare URL is not persistent: it is the single most common cause of a dead data link five years after publication. For proteomics data, deposit in PRIDE (PXD accession) or ProteomeXchange.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","why":"The only locator given is a web URL (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/) and the supplementary material, neither of which is a persistent identifier scheme (DOI, Handle, ARK, URN, or repository accession). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]","gain":16.67,"priority":"essential","scored":true},{"key":"f_repository_named","dimension":"F","label":"Named repository","action":"Deposit the data in a repository registered in re3data/FAIRsharing (a domain repository such as GEO, SRA, dbGaP, PRIDE, or a generalist such as Zenodo, Dryad, Dataverse) and name it explicitly in the paper. A lab website is not an archive: it has no retention commitment and no accession. For proteomics data, deposit in PRIDE (PXD accession) or ProteomeXchange.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","why":"The study's own data are held in the journal's supplementary material (non-repository host) and future APPRIS, not a named repository. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (2/5 passes agreed)]","gain":16.67,"priority":"essential","scored":true},{"key":"r_reuse_license","dimension":"R","label":"Reuse licence","action":"Attach a standard, machine-readable open licence to the deposit — CC0 or CC BY, which is what Horizon Europe and most funders expect — and print the licence identifier in the paper. 'Free to use' is not a licence: it grants nothing a reuser's institution can rely on.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":null,"why":"No license or terms document is named for the data; the article's CC-BY license applies to the paper, not the data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]","gain":16.67,"priority":"essential","scored":true},{"key":"a_data_openly_accessible","dimension":"A","label":"Access route free of preconditions","action":"Remove the precondition or justify it. Release the data at publication with no embargo, no registration wall, and no approval step — NIH's zero-embargo public- access rule (NOT-OD-25-101) has already made 'available at publication' the federal baseline for the article; the data should not lag behind it. For proteomics data, deposit in PRIDE (PXD accession) or ProteomeXchange.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"partial","current":0.5,"evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","why":"The text gives a route to the data with no stated precondition (no embargo, registration, or request required). [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]","gain":8.33,"priority":"essential","scored":true},{"key":"f_dataset_cited","dimension":"F","label":"Dataset formally cited","action":"Cite the dataset in the reference list like a publication — creator, year, title, repository, DOI/accession — and cite it in-text where it is used. Only a reference- list entry is machine-readable to Crossref/DataCite, and only a citation lets the data earn credit. Cite the proteomics repository accession (e.g. from PRIDE (PXD accession) or ProteomeXchange) in the reference list.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","why":"The dataset identifier/link appears only in the body text (data-availability statement) and not in the reference list. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]","gain":8.33,"priority":"important","scored":true},{"key":"i_open_nonproprietary_format","dimension":"I","label":"Open file format","action":"Release the data in an open, community-standard format (CSV/TSV, JSON, HDF5, NetCDF, FASTQ, VCF, NIfTI…) instead of — or alongside — any proprietary or instrument-native format, and name the format in the paper. A dataset that needs a €2,000 licence to open is not reusable. Prefer open proteomics formats such as mzML or mzIdentML.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":null,"why":"No file format is named for the released data; the supplementary material and APPRIS database do not specify a format.","gain":8.33,"priority":"important","scored":true},{"key":"x_code_availability","dimension":"R","label":"Analysis code available","action":"Publish the analysis code in a public forge, archive a tagged release with a DOI (Zenodo/Software Heritage), and cite that DOI in the paper. NIH DMS Element 2 asks for the tools and code, not only the data — and 'available on request' is not a locator. Archive the analysis code in a versioned repository (GitHub + a Zenodo release DOI).","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":null,"why":"The study's own code is not mentioned; no locator is provided.","gain":8.33,"priority":"important","scored":true},{"key":"r_versioning","dimension":"R","label":"Snapshot identified","action":"Version the deposit and cite the exact version analysed (a version-specific DOI, or an accession with its version suffix). A reader reproducing your work against 'the current release' is reproducing it against a different dataset.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":null,"why":"No version token or date is given for the study's own dataset; the source versions are given but not the merged list. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]","gain":4.17,"priority":"useful","scored":true},{"key":"f_data_availability_statement","dimension":"F","label":"Data-availability statement","action":"Replace the statement with the repository template: name the repository and give the accession or DOI (Colavizza category 3). This is the only DAS class associated with a measured citation advantage; 'available on reasonable request' and 'within the article' are not.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","why":"The statement points to the article's supplementary material and a repository homepage, but does not provide a repository record with an accession or persistent identifier; it falls under Colavizza category 2 (data in article/supplement). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]","gain":0.0,"priority":"essential","scored":false},{"key":"f_discovery_metadata","dimension":"F","label":"Description of the dataset as an object","action":"Add a 'Data Records' section: itemise every file in the deposit and every variable or sample it holds, with counts and units. Describe the dataset as an object in its own right, not as a by-product of the findings — this is what makes it discoverable to someone who is not looking for your paper.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","why":"The paper describes the dataset's content only in a running prose sentence (the data-availability statement) without an itemised inventory, section, table, or list. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]","gain":0.0,"priority":"essential","scored":false},{"key":"a_access_conditions_stated","dimension":"A","label":"Access level labelled","action":"State the access level in words, using the standard vocabulary: 'These data are open access' / 'These data are controlled access'. A reader — and a harvester — should not have to infer the access level from the presence of a download link.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","why":"The paper describes the action of accessing the data (supplementary material and APPRIS database) but applies no explicit access-level label such as 'open access'. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]","gain":0.0,"priority":"important","scored":false},{"key":"i_community_standard_vocabulary","dimension":"I","label":"Community standard / vocabulary","action":"Adopt and NAME your domain's data standard — the minimum-information checklist, metadata schema, or ontology your community uses (MIAME/MINSEQE, ISA-Tab, BIDS, an OBO ontology, HL7 FHIR/OMOP) — and say which one you followed. A reporting checklist standardises your paper; it does nothing for your data. In proteomics, describe the data with mzML or MIAPE.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":null,"why":"No data or metadata community standard (checklist, schema, ontology) is named for the study's own dataset; the paper uses standards in the analysis but not for the released data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]","gain":0.0,"priority":"important","scored":false},{"key":"r_documentation_codebook","dimension":"R","label":"Documentation / codebook","action":"Ship a README and a data dictionary IN the deposit — every file, every variable, its units, its allowed values, its missing-value codes. It is the cheapest single thing that makes a dataset usable by someone who was not in the lab, and a table buried in the article does not travel with the data.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"partial","current":0.5,"evidence":"The most common explanations as to why these genes were not annotated as coding were that they were readthrough genes (669), were annotated or tagged as pseudogenes (484), were annotated as IG/TR fragments (429), were antisense to a coding gene (239), were annotated as lncRNA (217), or were retrovirus-derived (72).","why":"Variable definitions (categories of non-coding status) are described inside the article, not in a separate documentation object shipped with the data. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]","gain":0.0,"priority":"important","scored":false},{"key":"a_controlled_access_for_sensitive","dimension":"A","label":"Gatekeeper for sensitive data","action":"Route sensitive data through an institutional gatekeeper — deposit in a controlled- access repository (dbGaP, EGA) with a Data Access Committee and a published DUA — rather than through the corresponding author's inbox. An author-gated dataset dies with the author's email address, and 'on reasonable request' has been shown repeatedly not to yield data.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":null,"why":"The data are not sensitive or human-subject; no gatekeeper is named, and the criterion is not applicable.","gain":0.0,"priority":"useful","scored":false},{"key":"a_timeline_retention","dimension":"A","label":"Availability timing & retention","action":"State when the data become available AND how long they will be retained — cite the repository's preservation policy. NIH DMS Element 4 asks for both; most papers give neither.","anchors":["yes","partial","no"],"verdict":"no","current":0.0,"evidence":"The merged list of genes and related data are available in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table 1) and will be available in the APPRIS database (https://appris.bioinfo.cnio.es/).","why":"The paper states that the data are available now (supplementary material) and will be available in the future (APPRIS), but says nothing about how long they persist. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]","gain":0.0,"priority":"useful","scored":false}],"suggestions":["Mint or cite a persistent identifier for the dataset — a repository DOI or an accession from a registered repository — and print it in the paper. A bare URL is not persistent: it is the single most common cause of a dead data link five years after publication. For proteomics data, deposit in PRIDE (PXD accession) or ProteomeXchange.","Deposit the data in a repository registered in re3data/FAIRsharing (a domain repository such as GEO, SRA, dbGaP, PRIDE, or a generalist such as Zenodo, Dryad, Dataverse) and name it explicitly in the paper. A lab website is not an archive: it has no retention commitment and no accession. For proteomics data, deposit in PRIDE (PXD accession) or ProteomeXchange.","Attach a standard, machine-readable open licence to the deposit — CC0 or CC BY, which is what Horizon Europe and most funders expect — and print the licence identifier in the paper. 'Free to use' is not a licence: it grants nothing a reuser's institution can rely on.","Remove the precondition or justify it. Release the data at publication with no embargo, no registration wall, and no approval step — NIH's zero-embargo public- access rule (NOT-OD-25-101) has already made 'available at publication' the federal baseline for the article; the data should not lag behind it. For proteomics data, deposit in PRIDE (PXD accession) or ProteomeXchange.","Cite the dataset in the reference list like a publication — creator, year, title, repository, DOI/accession — and cite it in-text where it is used. Only a reference- list entry is machine-readable to Crossref/DataCite, and only a citation lets the data earn credit. Cite the proteomics repository accession (e.g. from PRIDE (PXD accession) or ProteomeXchange) in the reference list."],"model":"deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash","agent_version":"fair_agent_v8","fulltext_source":"epmc_xml"},"fair_model":"deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash","fair_agent_version":"fair_agent_v8","fair_fulltext_source":"epmc_xml","fair_has_llm":true,"fair_computed_at":"2026-07-20T13:10:46.833745Z","clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}