{"doi":"10.1017/hgl.2016.29","title":"Kreines on the Problem of Metaphysics in Kant and Hegel","abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This article offers a discussion of James Kreines’s book <jats:italic>Reason in the World: Hegel’s Metaphysics and Its Philosophical Appeal</jats:italic>. While broadly sympathetic to Kreines’s ‘concept thesis’ as a conceptual realist account of Hegel, the article contrasts two Kantian arguments for transcendental idealism to which Hegel’s position may be seen as a response—the argument from synthetic a priori knowledge and the argument from the dialectic of reason—and explores the implications of Kreines’s commitment to the latter over the former.</jats:p>","journal":"Hegel Bulletin","year":2018,"id":18577,"datarank":0.5163176503036565,"base_score":2.302585092994046,"endowment":2.302585092994046,"self_citation_contribution":0.3453877639491069,"citation_network_contribution":0.17092988635454956,"self_endowment_contribution":0.3453877639491069,"citer_contribution":0.17092988635454956,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":9,"citer_count":9,"citers_with_citation_signal":4,"citers_with_endowment":4,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":37637,"name":"Robert Stern","orcid":null,"position":0,"is_corresponding":false}],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"base_score":2.302585092994046,"endowment":2.302585092994046,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"24259432","pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W2940062896","authors":[],"funders":[],"total_grants":0,"fwci":11.4855,"citation_percentile":0.98467657,"influential_citations":1,"citation_trend":[{"year":2016,"count":1},{"year":2018,"count":2},{"year":2019,"count":1},{"year":2020,"count":1},{"year":2021,"count":1},{"year":2022,"count":1},{"year":2024,"count":1},{"year":2025,"count":1}],"oa_status":"closed","license":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms","oa_locations":[{"url":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S2051536716000299","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2016.29","host_type":"journal"}],"fields_of_study":["Philosophical Ethics and Theory","Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations","Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","Philosophy"],"mesh_terms":[],"keywords":["Hegelianism","Philosophy","Metaphysics","Epistemology","Transcendental idealism","Dialectic","Transcendental number","Argument (complex analysis)","Transcendental philosophy","Idealism","Appeal","Critical philosophy","A priori and a posteriori","Law"],"sdg_mappings":[{"sdg_number":0,"sdg_label":"Reduced inequalities"}],"linked_datasets":[],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-06-03T22:44:07.281557Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}