{"doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2022.11.037","title":"Systematic review of reintervention with fenestrated or branched devices after failed previous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair","abstract":null,"journal":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","year":2023,"id":671593,"datarank":1.0810952198029653,"base_score":3.1780538303479458,"endowment":3.1780538303479458,"self_citation_contribution":0.47670807455219194,"citation_network_contribution":0.6043871452507733,"self_endowment_contribution":0.47670807455219194,"citer_contribution":0.6043871452507733,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":23,"citer_count":15,"citers_with_citation_signal":7,"citers_with_endowment":7,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":1750839,"name":"Tilo Kölbel","orcid":"0000-0002-9962-0204","position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1754566,"name":"Christian-Alexander Behrendt","orcid":null,"position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1754567,"name":"George Kouvelos","orcid":null,"position":3,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1754568,"name":"Athanasios Giannoukas","orcid":null,"position":4,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1754569,"name":"Stephan Haulon","orcid":null,"position":5,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1754570,"name":"Konstantinos Spanos","orcid":null,"position":6,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1754565,"name":"Petroula Nana","orcid":"0000-0001-9060-8519","position":0,"is_corresponding":false}],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"resolved":true,"title":"Systematic review of reintervention with fenestrated or branched devices after failed previous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair","abstract":"<h4>Background</h4>A proximal seal extension, after previously failed standard endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), has been described using various endovascular techniques. The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the technical success, 30-day mortality, and mortality and reintervention rates during the available follow-up for patients managed with endovascular methods after failed endovascular repair.<h4>Methods</h4>The present systematic review followed the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) statement and was preregistered at PROSPERO (no. CRD42022350436). A search of the English literature, via Ovid, using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases, until June 15, 2022, was performed. Observational studies (2000-2022) and case series with at least five patients who had undergone fenestrated/branched EVAR (F/BEVAR) after failed EVAR were considered eligible. Technical success and mortality at 30 days and the mortality and reintervention rates during available follow-up had to have been reported. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias. The primary outcome was technical success and mortality at 30 days.<h4>Results</h4>The initial search yielded 2558 reports. Ten studies were considered eligible, two of which were prospective. A total of 423 patients had undergone F/BEVAR after failed EVAR. The indication for reintervention was the presence of a type Ia endoleak in 44.9%. Technical success was reported in seven studies, and 319 of 336 interventions were considered successful (94.9%), according to each study's criteria. Of the 423 patients, 10 had died within 30 days (2.4%). Seven patients had presented with spinal cord ischemia (2.4%). Twenty-three acute kidney injury events were reported (6.8%). The mean follow-up was 18 months (range, 1-77 months). During follow-up, 47 deaths were reported (14.8%). Finally, 50 reinterventions of 303 procedures (16.5%) had been performed.<h4>Conclusions</h4>According to the available literature, F/BEVAR after failed EVAR can be performed with high technical success and low mortality during the perioperative period. The midterm mortality and reintervention rates were acceptable. However, further data are needed to provide firm conclusions regarding the safety and durability of F/BEVAR after failed EVAR.","is_dataset_classified":null,"base_score":3.1780538303479458,"endowment":3.1780538303479458,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"36375726","pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W4309078090","authors":[],"funders":[],"total_grants":0,"fwci":1.5056,"citation_percentile":0.8018018,"influential_citations":1,"citation_trend":[{"year":2022,"count":1},{"year":2023,"count":5},{"year":2024,"count":3},{"year":2025,"count":9},{"year":2026,"count":5}],"oa_status":"green","license":"cc-by-nc","oa_locations":[{"url":"https://hal.science/hal-04519979/document","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"https://hal.science/hal-04519979/document","host_type":"GREEN"},{"url":"https://hal.science/hal-04519979/document","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0741521422025137?httpAccept=text/xml","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0741521422025137?httpAccept=text/plain","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://hal.science/hal-04519979","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2022.11.037","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36375726","host_type":"repository"},{"url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11615/76889","host_type":"repository"}],"fields_of_study":["Aortic aneurysm repair treatments","Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches","Vascular Procedures and Complications","Medicine","Humans","Blood Vessel Prosthesis","Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation","Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal","Prospective Studies","Endovascular Procedures","Retrospective Studies","Treatment Outcome","Risk Factors","Prosthesis Design"],"mesh_terms":["Blood Vessel Prosthesis","Humans","Prospective Studies","Prosthesis Design","Retrospective Studies","Risk Factors","Treatment Outcome","Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal","Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation","Endovascular Procedures"],"keywords":["Medicine","Endovascular aneurysm repair","Surgery","Aneurysm","Aortic aneurysm","Aortic repair","Abdominal aortic aneurysm","Mortality","Reintervention","Technical Success","F/bevar","Failed Endovascular Repair"],"sdg_mappings":[{"sdg_number":0,"sdg_label":"Good health and well-being"}],"linked_datasets":[],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-08-16T03:28:50.869495Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}