{"doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.001","title":"A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification","abstract":null,"journal":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","year":2005,"id":624013,"datarank":6.108252736037387,"base_score":4.875197323201151,"endowment":4.875197323201151,"self_citation_contribution":0.7312795984801728,"citation_network_contribution":5.376973137557214,"self_endowment_contribution":0.7312795984801728,"citer_contribution":5.376973137557214,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":130,"citer_count":125,"citers_with_citation_signal":107,"citers_with_endowment":107,"datacite_reuse_total":8,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":1613000,"name":"Ivan Solá","orcid":null,"position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1613001,"name":"Josep M. Garcia","orcid":null,"position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1613002,"name":"Ignasi Gich","orcid":null,"position":3,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1613003,"name":"Gerard Urrútia","orcid":null,"position":4,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1612999,"name":"Mireia Subirana","orcid":null,"position":0,"is_corresponding":false}],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"resolved":true,"title":"A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification","abstract":"<h4>Objective</h4>Analyze the number and the relevance of references retrieved from CINAHL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE to perform a nursing systematic review.<h4>Study design</h4>A search strategy for the review topic was designed according to thesaurus terms. The study analyzes (1) references with abstract, (2) overlap between databases, (3) reference relevance, (4) relevance agreement between experts, and (5) reference accessibility.<h4>Results</h4>Bibliographic search retrieved 232 references: 16% (37) in CINAHL, 68% (157) in MEDLINE, and 16% (38) in EMBASE. Of these, 72% (164) were references retrieved with an abstract: 14% (23) in CINAHL, 70% (115) in MEDLINE, and 16% (26) in EMBASE. Overlap was observed in 2% (5) of the references. Relevance assessment reduced the number of references to 43 (19%): 12 (34.3%) in CINAHL, 31 (19.7%) in MEDLINE, and none in EMBASE (Z=-1.97; P=.048). Agreement between experts achieved a maximum Cohen's kappa of 0.76 (P < .005). References identified in CINAHL were the most difficult to obtain (chi(2)=3.9; df=1; P=.048).<h4>Conclusions</h4>To perform a quality bibliographic search for a systematic review on nursing topics, CINAHL and MEDLINE are essential databases for consultation to maximize the accuracy of the search.","is_dataset_classified":null,"base_score":4.875197323201151,"endowment":4.875197323201151,"datacite_reuse_total":8,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"15649667","pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W2164143189","authors":[],"funders":[],"total_grants":0,"fwci":0.5556,"citation_percentile":0.46835443,"influential_citations":5,"citation_trend":[{"year":2012,"count":1},{"year":2013,"count":3},{"year":2014,"count":5},{"year":2015,"count":6},{"year":2016,"count":2},{"year":2017,"count":4},{"year":2018,"count":3},{"year":2019,"count":6},{"year":2020,"count":6},{"year":2021,"count":5},{"year":2022,"count":13},{"year":2023,"count":23},{"year":2024,"count":19},{"year":2025,"count":14},{"year":2026,"count":3}],"oa_status":"closed","license":"https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/","oa_locations":[{"url":"https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0895435604001672?httpAccept=text/xml","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0895435604001672?httpAccept=text/plain","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.001","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15649667","host_type":"repository"}],"fields_of_study":["Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","Academic Writing and Publishing","Health Sciences Research and Education","Medicine","Bibliometrics","Clinical Nursing Research","Databases, Bibliographic","Humans","MEDLINE","Nursing Administration Research","Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care","Review Literature as Topic","Workload"],"mesh_terms":["Humans","Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care","Review Literature as Topic","Clinical Nursing Research","Nursing Administration Research","Bibliometrics","Databases, Bibliographic","MEDLINE","Workload"],"keywords":["CINAHL","MEDLINE","Medicine","Relevance (law)","Information retrieval","Computer science","Nursing","Psychological intervention"],"sdg_mappings":[{"sdg_number":0,"sdg_label":"Quality Education"}],"linked_datasets":[{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.22626253.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Comparison of the efficacy and safety of conventional curettage adenoidectomy with those of other adenoidectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.22626253","title":"Additional file 1 of Comparison of the efficacy and safety of conventional curettage adenoidectomy with those of other adenoidectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.22626256.v1","title":"Additional file 2 of Comparison of the efficacy and safety of conventional curettage adenoidectomy with those of other adenoidectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.22626256","title":"Additional file 2 of Comparison of the efficacy and safety of conventional curettage adenoidectomy with those of other adenoidectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.22626259.v1","title":"Additional file 3 of Comparison of the efficacy and safety of conventional curettage adenoidectomy with those of other adenoidectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.22626259","title":"Additional file 3 of Comparison of the efficacy and safety of conventional curettage adenoidectomy with those of other adenoidectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.24598014.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of The prevalence of malnutrition among critically ill children: a systematic review and meta-analysis","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"},{"doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.24598014","title":"Additional file 1 of The prevalence of malnutrition among critically ill children: a systematic review and meta-analysis","publisher":"figshare","resource_type":"JournalArticle"}],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-08-04T02:19:25.821692Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}