{"doi":"10.1007/s11192-007-1950-2","title":"Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication","abstract":null,"journal":"Scientometrics","year":2008,"id":11728,"datarank":3.0507175453087623,"base_score":4.1588830833596715,"endowment":4.1588830833596715,"self_citation_contribution":0.6238324625039509,"citation_network_contribution":2.4268850828048114,"self_endowment_contribution":0.6238324625039509,"citer_contribution":2.4268850828048114,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":63,"citer_count":57,"citers_with_citation_signal":45,"citers_with_endowment":45,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":0.0508,"is_oa":true,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":"2008-09-17","fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":94427,"name":"Irina Nast","orcid":"0000-0001-8791-9834","position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":5654,"name":"Hans‐Dieter Daniel","orcid":"0000-0001-7925-1846","position":3,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":661,"name":"Lutz Bornmann","orcid":"0000-0003-0810-7091","position":0,"is_corresponding":true}],"reference_count":32,"raw_metadata":{"citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-03-01T18:20:47.508186Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}