{"doi":"10.1007/s10862-024-10155-y","title":"Improved Scoring of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale – Revised: An Item Response Theory Analysis","abstract":"Abstract The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale – Revised (CESD-R) is a popular self-report screening measure for depression. A 20-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 4 for each item, the CESD-R can produce total scores ranging from 0 to 80. However, the typical scoring protocol for the CESD-R restricts the range of possible scores to between 0 and 60 to retain the same range and clinical cutoff scores as the original CES-D. Despite the widespread adoption of this scoring approach, the psychometric impact has never been systematically examined. In an undergraduate and community adult sample ( n = 869), item response theory analyses indicated that scoring the CESD-R with all 5 response options (CESD-R 5opt ) provided nearly twice as much information about a person’s latent depression for individuals with high levels of depression than did scoring the CESD-R with 4 response options per item (CESD-R 4opt ). The CESD-R 5opt retained the strong reliability and factor structure of the CESD-R 4opt and was more sensitive to individual differences for participants at high levels of depression compared to the CESD-R 4opt . Results provide preliminary evidence that researchers and clinicians should score the CESD-R using the full 0-to-80 scale and a clinical cutoff score of 29.","journal":"Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment","year":2024,"id":445077,"datarank":0.0,"base_score":0.0,"endowment":0.0,"self_citation_contribution":0.0,"citation_network_contribution":0.0,"self_endowment_contribution":0.0,"citer_contribution":0.0,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":7,"citer_count":0,"citers_with_citation_signal":0,"citers_with_endowment":0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":0.9464,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":true,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":"2024-01-01","fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":1260974,"name":"S. Mueller","orcid":"0009-0003-8862-1505","position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1235241,"name":"George Abitante","orcid":"0000-0002-6422-8974","position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":419489,"name":"Jeffrey A. Ciesla","orcid":"0000-0002-2635-3061","position":3,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":666311,"name":"Sun‐Joo Cho","orcid":"0000-0002-2600-8305","position":4,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":599826,"name":"David A. Cole","orcid":"0000-0002-7535-1230","position":5,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1052996,"name":"Christian A. L. Bean","orcid":"0000-0002-3119-7841","position":0,"is_corresponding":true}],"reference_count":41,"raw_metadata":null,"created_at":"2026-07-19T02:01:42.089235Z","pmid":"39372194","pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}