{"doi":"10.1002/pits.20235","title":"The use of generalizability theory to estimate data reliability in single‐subject observational research","abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Direct observation of behaviors is a data collection method customarily used in clinical and educational settings. Repeated measures and small samples are inherent characteristics of observational studies that pose challenges to the numerical estimation of reliability for observational data. In this article, we review some debates about the use of Generalizability Theory in estimating reliability of single‐subject observational data. We propose that it could be used but under a clearly stated set of conditions. The conceptualization of facets and object of measurement for a common design of observational research is elucidated under a different light. We provide two numerical examples to illustrate the ideas. Limitations of using Generalizability Theory to estimate reliability of observational data are discussed. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 44: 433–439, 2007.</jats:p>","journal":"Psychology in the Schools","year":2007,"id":627375,"datarank":0.40620753016533157,"base_score":2.70805020110221,"endowment":2.70805020110221,"self_citation_contribution":0.40620753016533157,"citation_network_contribution":0.0,"self_endowment_contribution":0.40620753016533157,"citer_contribution":0.0,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":14,"citer_count":0,"citers_with_citation_signal":0,"citers_with_endowment":0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":445626,"name":"Maria Smith","orcid":"0000-0002-9742-5675","position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1623755,"name":"Hoi K. Suen","orcid":null,"position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":780130,"name":"Pui‐Wa Lei","orcid":"0000-0002-8179-6623","position":0,"is_corresponding":false}],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"resolved":true,"title":"The use of generalizability theory to estimate data reliability in single‐subject observational research","abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Direct observation of behaviors is a data collection method customarily used in clinical and educational settings. Repeated measures and small samples are inherent characteristics of observational studies that pose challenges to the numerical estimation of reliability for observational data. In this article, we review some debates about the use of Generalizability Theory in estimating reliability of single‐subject observational data. We propose that it could be used but under a clearly stated set of conditions. The conceptualization of facets and object of measurement for a common design of observational research is elucidated under a different light. We provide two numerical examples to illustrate the ideas. Limitations of using Generalizability Theory to estimate reliability of observational data are discussed. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 44: 433–439, 2007.</jats:p>","is_dataset_classified":null,"base_score":2.70805020110221,"endowment":2.70805020110221,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"19910364","pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W2110307640","authors":[],"funders":[],"total_grants":0,"fwci":0.9304,"citation_percentile":0.77859755,"influential_citations":0,"citation_trend":[{"year":2014,"count":4},{"year":2016,"count":2},{"year":2018,"count":1},{"year":2021,"count":1},{"year":2024,"count":1},{"year":2025,"count":1}],"oa_status":"bronze","license":"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor","oa_locations":[{"url":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/pits.20235","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/pits.20235","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fpits.20235","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/pits.20235","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20235","host_type":"journal"},{"url":"http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.533.4451","host_type":""}],"fields_of_study":["Behavioral and Psychological Studies","Reliability and Agreement in Measurement","Psychometric Methodologies and Testing"],"mesh_terms":[],"keywords":["Generalizability theory","Observational study","Conceptualization","Reliability (semiconductor)","Psychology","Observational methods in psychology","Data collection","Subject (documents)","Observational learning","Research design","Statistics","Computer science","Artificial intelligence","Mathematics education","Mathematics","Developmental psychology"],"sdg_mappings":[{"sdg_number":0,"sdg_label":"Quality Education"}],"linked_datasets":[],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-08-04T17:18:02.640091Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}