{"doi":"10.1002/nbm.70211","title":"Multi‐Parameter Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Cervix","abstract":"ABSTRACT The aim of this study is to examine cervix‐adapted versions of steady‐state multi‐parameter MRS (SMP MRS) and flip‐angle‐corrected multi‐parameter MRS (CMP MRS), comparing estimated cervix T1 w and T2 w for the two sequences. CMP MRS and SMP MRS were adapted from liver versions of the sequences, adding long TR acquisitions to better estimate cervix T1 w . CMP MRS differs from SMP MRS by correcting for inaccurate B1 calibration. Both CMP MRS and SMP MRS were acquired at 3 T in 13 adult female subjects (10 healthy, 3 with cancer). Values of T1 w and T2 w were estimated from both sequences, and the relationship between the values was examined. While there was no significant difference in T1 w given by the two sequences (CMP T1 w = 1568 ms, SMP T1 w = 1571 ms, p = 0.95; SMP T1 w = 0.657 CMP T1 w + 541 ms, r = 0.36), there was a single case where SMP MRS underestimated T1 w by over 400 ms. A significant difference was observed in T2 w (CMP T2 w = 39.9 ms, SMP T2 w = 45.6 ms, p = 0.001; SMP T2 w = 0.812 CMP T2 w + 13.3 ms, r = 0.87). Cervix adapted CMP MRS and SMP MRS both successfully estimated values of T1 w and T2 w , though the single case where SMP MRS gave a non‐physical T1 w suggests CMP MRS may be better suited for cervix T1 w estimation.","journal":"NMR in Biomedicine","year":2025,"id":585086,"datarank":0.0,"base_score":0.0,"endowment":0.0,"self_citation_contribution":0.0,"citation_network_contribution":0.0,"self_endowment_contribution":0.0,"citer_contribution":0.0,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":0,"citer_count":0,"citers_with_citation_signal":0,"citers_with_endowment":0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":0.9501,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":"2025-01-01","fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":1498918,"name":"Nicole A. Gamboa","orcid":null,"position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1498919,"name":"Alex N. Schlein","orcid":null,"position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1248021,"name":"Sheida Ebrahimi","orcid":"0000-0001-9611-4261","position":3,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1248425,"name":"Summer Batasin","orcid":null,"position":4,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1498920,"name":"Hon Yu","orcid":null,"position":5,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1498921,"name":"Stephan Jordan","orcid":null,"position":6,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1431315,"name":"Breana Hill","orcid":"0000-0003-2240-4009","position":7,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":461269,"name":"Catherine J. Moran","orcid":"0000-0001-9748-9495","position":8,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":360586,"name":"Ana E. Rodríguez‐Soto","orcid":"0000-0002-9544-547X","position":9,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":360597,"name":"Rebecca Rakow‐Penner","orcid":"0000-0002-2566-1978","position":10,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":433676,"name":"Gavin Hamilton","orcid":"0000-0001-9302-5546","position":0,"is_corresponding":true}],"reference_count":13,"raw_metadata":null,"created_at":"2026-07-19T02:59:20.067334Z","pmid":"41387251","pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}