{"doi":"10.1002/nbm.5089","title":"A rapid method for phosphocreatine‐weighted imaging in muscle using double saturation power‐chemical exchange saturation transfer","abstract":"Monitoring the variation in phosphocreatine (PCr) levels following exercise provides valuable insights into muscle function. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) has emerged as a sensitive method with which to measure PCr levels in muscle, surpassing conventional MR spectroscopy. However, existing approaches for quantifying PCr CEST signals rely on time-consuming fitting methods that require the acquisition of the entire or a section of the CEST Z-spectrum. Additionally, traditional fitting methods often necessitate clear CEST peaks, which may be challenging to obtain at low magnetic fields. This paper evaluated the application of a new model-free method using double saturation power (DSP), termed DSP-CEST, to estimate the PCr CEST signal in muscle. The DSP-CEST method requires the acquisition of only two or a few CEST signals at the PCr frequency offset with two different saturation powers, enabling rapid dynamic imaging. Additionally, the DSP-CEST approach inherently eliminates confounding signals, offering enhanced robustness compared with fitting methods. Furthermore, DSP-CEST does not demand clear CEST peaks, making it suitable for low-field applications. We evaluated the capability of DSP-CEST to enhance the specificity of PCr CEST imaging through simulations and experiments on muscle tissue phantoms at 4.7 T. Furthermore, we applied DSP-CEST to animal leg muscle both before and after euthanasia and observed successful reduction of confounding signals. The DSP-CEST signal still has contaminations from a residual magnetization transfer (MT) effect and an aromatic nuclear Overhauser enhancement effect, and thus only provides a PCr-weighted imaging. The residual MT effect can be reduced by a subtraction of DSP-CEST signals at 2.6 and 5 ppm. Results show that the residual MT-corrected DSP-CEST signal at 2.6 ppm has significant variation in postmortem tissues. By contrast, both the CEST signal at 2.6 ppm and a conventional Lorentzian difference analysis of CEST signal at 2.6 ppm demonstrate no significant variation in postmortem tissues.","journal":"NMR in Biomedicine","year":2023,"id":352157,"datarank":0.0,"base_score":0.0,"endowment":0.0,"self_citation_contribution":0.0,"citation_network_contribution":0.0,"self_endowment_contribution":0.0,"citer_contribution":0.0,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":9,"citer_count":0,"citers_with_citation_signal":0,"citers_with_endowment":0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":0.9575,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":true,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":"2023-01-01","fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":1091645,"name":"Yashwant Kurmi","orcid":"0000-0003-4986-2106","position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":344640,"name":"Zhongliang Zu","orcid":"0000-0001-7361-7480","position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1081756,"name":"Malvika Viswanathan","orcid":"0009-0001-9522-0780","position":0,"is_corresponding":true}],"reference_count":66,"raw_metadata":null,"created_at":"2026-07-19T01:12:50.107998Z","pmid":"38114069","pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}