{"doi":"10.1002/nau.1930080604","title":"Comparison of different methods for quantification of urinary leakage in incontinent women","abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate different methods for assessment of diagnosis and severity of urinary incontinence, 72 women underwent two consecutive 24 hours pad tests, a 1 hour pad test, a stress test, urodynamic examination, and a voiding‐cysto‐urethrography. The results were analysed and related to clinical findings.</jats:p><jats:p>The 24 hours pad test revealed a good patient compliance, was as informative as to grade of incontinence as a 48 hours test, was reliable for all grades and types of incontinence, and correlated to clinical findings.</jats:p><jats:p>The 1 hour pad test underestimated the grade of incontinence and was less correlated to clinical parameters than the 24 hours test.</jats:p><jats:p>To estimate a level for pathological leakage, 25 continent controls underwent a 24 hours pad test. The results of the pad tests could be stratified by mean leakage per 24 hours as follows: up to 5 g in continent women, 40 g in mild incontinence, 80 g in moderate incontinence, and 200 g in severe incontinence.</jats:p><jats:p>It could be concluded that a 24 hours home test was the pad test of choice for quantification and diagnosis of urinary incontinence.</jats:p>","journal":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","year":1989,"id":687587,"datarank":0.635115975689589,"base_score":4.23410650459726,"endowment":4.23410650459726,"self_citation_contribution":0.635115975689589,"citation_network_contribution":0.0,"self_endowment_contribution":0.635115975689589,"citer_contribution":0.0,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":68,"citer_count":0,"citers_with_citation_signal":0,"citers_with_endowment":0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":null,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":false,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":null,"fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":1796309,"name":"Grethe Berild","orcid":null,"position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1796310,"name":"Jens Hertz","orcid":null,"position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":1796308,"name":"Lone Mouritsen","orcid":null,"position":0,"is_corresponding":false}],"reference_count":0,"raw_metadata":{"has_enrichment":true,"resolved":true,"title":"Comparison of different methods for quantification of urinary leakage in incontinent women","abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate different methods for assessment of diagnosis and severity of urinary incontinence, 72 women underwent two consecutive 24 hours pad tests, a 1 hour pad test, a stress test, urodynamic examination, and a voiding‐cysto‐urethrography. The results were analysed and related to clinical findings.</jats:p><jats:p>The 24 hours pad test revealed a good patient compliance, was as informative as to grade of incontinence as a 48 hours test, was reliable for all grades and types of incontinence, and correlated to clinical findings.</jats:p><jats:p>The 1 hour pad test underestimated the grade of incontinence and was less correlated to clinical parameters than the 24 hours test.</jats:p><jats:p>To estimate a level for pathological leakage, 25 continent controls underwent a 24 hours pad test. The results of the pad tests could be stratified by mean leakage per 24 hours as follows: up to 5 g in continent women, 40 g in mild incontinence, 80 g in moderate incontinence, and 200 g in severe incontinence.</jats:p><jats:p>It could be concluded that a 24 hours home test was the pad test of choice for quantification and diagnosis of urinary incontinence.</jats:p>","is_dataset_classified":null,"base_score":4.23410650459726,"endowment":4.23410650459726,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"views":0,"has_version_chain":false,"is_dataset":false,"is_oa":false,"pmid":"26207759","pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"https://openalex.org/W2120151954","authors":[],"funders":[],"total_grants":0,"fwci":0.8098,"citation_percentile":0.7393255,"influential_citations":0,"citation_trend":[{"year":2012,"count":1},{"year":2013,"count":1},{"year":2014,"count":2},{"year":2015,"count":1},{"year":2016,"count":1},{"year":2017,"count":2},{"year":2019,"count":2},{"year":2020,"count":1},{"year":2021,"count":1},{"year":2022,"count":2},{"year":2024,"count":1}],"oa_status":"closed","license":"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor","oa_locations":[{"url":"https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fnau.1930080604","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/nau.1930080604","host_type":"publisher"},{"url":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.1930080604","host_type":"journal"}],"fields_of_study":["Pelvic floor disorders treatments","Urinary Tract Infections Management","Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes"],"mesh_terms":[],"keywords":["Medicine","Urinary incontinence","Urinary Leakage","Pathological","Urology","Urodynamic testing","Urinary system","Surgery","Internal medicine"],"sdg_mappings":[{"sdg_number":0,"sdg_label":"Good health and well-being"}],"linked_datasets":[],"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"database_accessions":[],"source":"live","citation_network_status":"fetched"},"created_at":"2026-08-18T22:17:06.094585Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}