{"doi":"10.1002/14651858.cd013522","title":"Smoking cessation for improving mental health","abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;\\nThere is a common perception that smoking generally helps people to manage stress, and may be a form of 'self‐medication' in people with mental health conditions. However, there are biologically plausible reasons why smoking may worsen mental health through neuroadaptations arising from chronic smoking, leading to frequent nicotine withdrawal symptoms (e.g. anxiety, depression, irritability), in which case smoking cessation may help to improve rather than worsen mental health.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;\\n\\n&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;\\nTo examine the association between tobacco smoking cessation and change in mental health.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;\\n\\n&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Search Methods:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;\\nWe searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group's Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and the trial registries clinicaltrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, from 14 April 2012 to 07 January 2020. These were updated searches of a previously‐conducted non‐Cochrane review where searches were conducted from database inception to 13 April 2012.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;\\n\\n&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Selection Criteria:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;\\nWe included controlled before‐after studies, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysed by smoking status at follow‐up, and longitudinal cohort studies. In order to be eligible for inclusion studies had to recruit adults who smoked tobacco, and assess whether they quit or continued smoking during the study. They also had to measure a mental health outcome at baseline and at least six weeks later.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;\\n\\n&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Data Collection and Analysis:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;\\nWe followed standard Cochrane methods for screening and data extraction. Our primary outcomes were change in depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms or mixed anxiety and depression symptoms between baseline and follow‐up. Secondary outcomes included change in symptoms of stress, psychological quality of life, positive affect, and social impact or social quality of life, as well as new incidence of depression, anxiety, or mixed anxiety and depression disorders.&lt;br /&gt;\\n\\nWe assessed the risk of bias for the primary outcomes using a modified ROBINS‐I tool. For change in mental health outcomes, we calculated the pooled standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the difference in change in mental health from baseline to follow‐up between those who had quit smoking and those who had continued to smoke. For the incidence of psychological disorders, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. For all meta‐analyses we used a generic inverse variance random‐effects model and quantified statistical heterogeneity using I2. We conducted subgroup analyses to investigate any differences in associations between sub‐populations, i.e. unselected people with mental illness, people with physical chronic diseases.&lt;br /&gt;\\n\\nWe assessed the certainty of evidence for our primary outcomes (depression, anxiety, and mixed depression and anxiety) and our secondary social impact outcome using the eight GRADE considerations relevant to non‐randomised studies (risk of bias, inconsistency, imprecision, indirectness, publication bias, magnitude of the effect, the influence of all plausible residual confounding, the presence of a dose‐response gradient).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;\\n\\n&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main Results:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;\\nWe included 102 studies representing over 169,500 participants. Sixty‐two of these were identified in the updated search for this review and 40 were included in the original version of the review. Sixty‐three studies provided data on change in mental health, 10 were included in meta‐analyses of incidence of mental health disorders, and 31 were synthesi","journal":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","year":2020,"id":82447,"datarank":0.0,"base_score":0.0,"endowment":0.0,"self_citation_contribution":0.0,"citation_network_contribution":0.0,"self_endowment_contribution":0.0,"citer_contribution":0.0,"corpus_percentile":null,"corpus_rank":null,"citation_count":13,"citer_count":0,"citers_with_citation_signal":0,"citers_with_endowment":0,"datacite_reuse_total":0,"is_dataset":false,"is_dataset_confidence":0.9586,"is_data_producer":false,"deposit_databanks":null,"is_oa":true,"file_count":0,"downloads":0,"has_version_chain":false,"published_date":"2020-01-01","fair_score":null,"fair_percentile":null,"algorithm_id":"datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6","ranking_scope":"data_only","authors":[{"id":425619,"name":"Ann McNeill","orcid":"0000-0002-6223-4000","position":1,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":76147,"name":"Amanda Farley","orcid":"0000-0002-4370-0264","position":2,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":425620,"name":"Nicola Lindson","orcid":"0000-0003-2539-9268","position":3,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":425621,"name":"Paul Aveyard","orcid":"0000-0002-1802-4217","position":4,"is_corresponding":false},{"id":425618,"name":"Gemma Taylor","orcid":"0000-0003-2185-0162","position":0,"is_corresponding":true}],"reference_count":31,"raw_metadata":null,"created_at":"2026-07-18T21:53:48.608934Z","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"fwci":null,"citation_percentile":null,"influential_citations":0,"oa_status":null,"license":null,"views":0,"total_file_size_bytes":0,"version_count":0,"fair_f":null,"fair_a":null,"fair_i":null,"fair_r":null,"fair_zscore":null,"fair_rationale":null,"fair_model":null,"fair_agent_version":null,"fair_fulltext_source":null,"fair_has_llm":null,"fair_computed_at":null,"clinical_trials":[],"software_tools":[],"db_accessions":[],"linked_datasets":[],"topics":[]}